blob: 6cab9261cb0aa39a47da2a0e4d484751dd122e58 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
|
<p><br>
Le 11 mars 2012 12:15, "Wolfgang Bornath" <<a href="mailto:molch.b@googlemail.com">molch.b@googlemail.com</a>> a écrit :<br>
><br>
> 2012/3/11 Luc Menut <<a href="mailto:lmenut@free.fr">lmenut@free.fr</a>>:<br>
> > Le 10/03/2012 23:49, Oliver Burger a écrit :<br>
> >><br>
> >> Am 10.03.2012 23:46, schrieb Juan Luis Baptiste:<br>
> ><br>
> > [...]<br>
> >>><br>
> >>> Right now, the splitting of the handbook packages will use the same<br>
> >>> bandwidth as before. As Anssi said, before the handbooks came bundled<br>
> >>> with the owner package, so they were also being installed. So<br>
> >>> bandwidth wise, is still the same as before the splitting.<br>
> >>><br>
> >> I haven't looked into it, but perhaps we could install those handbooks<br>
> >> as Suggests instead of Requires (or is it already done that way?).<br>
> >> Then people wanting to save bandwidth could just install using<br>
> >> "--no-suggests".<br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > I don't agree. Handbooks are fully part of a kde install; they should be<br>
> > installed, and shouldn't be removed. A kde install without handbooks is a<br>
> > damaged kde install. Do you think that the kde doc team will continue to<br>
> > work on handbooks if each distrib don't install its work?<br>
> > That's why, personally I think the exact opposite; each component should<br>
> > *requires* its handbook (but probably it won't work with LiveCD).<br>
><br>
> I don't agree. You seem to first take for granted that a user of the<br>
> KDE desktop also uses all the applications and second you mistake<br>
> "good to have" for "must have". I'm using KDE but only few KDE<br>
> applications - so why do I need a handbook for kppp or knode or kmail<br>
> when I don't even install these applications? I would happily<br>
> de-install such handbooks as I regularly unmark grub-doc and similar<br>
> packages from installation.<br>
><br>
> In your previous reply to Juergen you also showed that you<br>
> misunderstood his wish for Mageia documentation. It is good and<br>
> important that documentation is available if needed. But it must not<br>
> be forced on those who don't want/need it.<br>
><br>
> I may add that I have been involved in documentation writing and<br>
> translating for almost 7 years. But I never thought that users must<br>
> use it if they don't need it.<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> wobo</p>
<p>I agree that documentation has to be available with the application i use. While i use the program and i need more infos i press F1. If the handbook it is not available what i will have ? A message informs me that the doc is missing or it has to be installed manualy? </p>
<p>As when you get any product it comes with its manual, i believe that the handbook of an application is a must have, and an application should never be installed without its documentation.</p>
|
