blob: 95469aa25d9b64b8b764286e1b254566fd8bfdf5 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
|
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:32 AM, D.Morgan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dmorganec@gmail.com">dmorganec@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Markus Ueberall<br>
<<a href="mailto:Markus.Ueberall@gmail.com">Markus.Ueberall@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Am 18.11.2011 04:52, schrieb David W. Hodgins:<br>
>> Agreed. Just want to make sure that anyone who is using the<br>
>> sun java package from the repositories know that they must<br>
>> get the latest security updates directly from <a href="http://java.com" target="_blank">java.com</a>, as<br>
>> the packages in the Mageia repositories are not being updated.<br>
>><br>
>> Regards, Dave Hodgins<br>
><br>
> Hi,<br>
<div class="im">><br>
> I wonder whether it is feasible to come up with a "get-sun-java" rpm<br>
</div>> which uses the same mechanism as the get-skype rpm for those who<br>
> need/prefer Oracle's implementation?<br>
><br>
> Ad astra, Markus<br>
<br>
Why ? openjdk is good enough to replace oracle java.<br>
and soonish we will have java7 too in mageia so i really don't see now<br>
the need of the closed source one.<br></blockquote><div><br><br>Everything you said is true, but let me disagree with your question. Why not? Some users might prefer Oracle's java, while others might rather use OpenJDK. As long as there are volunteers for maintaining both packages, why shou;d it be one or the other? Why not providing both?<br>
<br><br>Alejandro.</div></div>
|
