1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
|
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 18:30, Samuel Verschelde <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stormi@laposte.net">stormi@laposte.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Of course yes, silly question !<br>
<br>
But how many use the kernel from the Core Updates Testing media ? It's an<br>
update candidate (bugfix + security), and we would like to have it tested<br>
<br>
Just install it, reboot, check that there is no regression in your hardware<br>
handling, and give us feedback on the bug report !<br>
<br>
If something goes well, no problem, you can still choose an older kernel from<br>
the boot menu and report the problems you had in the bug report.<br>
<br>
The bug report: <a href="https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2642" target="_blank">https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2642</a><br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>Alternatively, I'd suggest using the same approach as Arch folks are doing - the one who installs the update candidate package, and it works for him, just replies with a:<br>Signed-Off for $ARCH<br>
<br>(E.g., Signed-Off for i686; or Signed-Off for x86_64 - to indicate what architecture the update was tested on).<br><br>Not sure if this will spam the list a lot, but those are mine $0.02.. :) <br clear="all"></div></div>
<br>-- <br>Eugeni Dodonov<a href="http://eugeni.dodonov.net/" target="_blank"><br></a><br>
|
