blob: f0c3e48245e2c505da1befbfba898fc1fbce30ab (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
|
<div class="gmail_quote">2011/6/7 Olav Vitters <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:olav@vitters.nl">olav@vitters.nl</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote:<br>
> On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep<br>
> and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable<br>
> and reliable and complete yet.<br>
<br>
GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll<br>
give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like<br>
GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel.<br></blockquote></div>Fallback mode would be killed someday....<br><br>I don't think that a good statement to argue that GNOME3 can replace<br><br>GNOME2.<br>
|
