blob: 213972e9eb1c2fb3d9c79642bfb0035861936b91 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000066" bgcolor="#33ccff">
Le 25/09/2010 15:55, Farfouille a écrit :
<blockquote cite="mid:4C9DFF34.9040100@free.fr" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
Le 25/09/2010 14:49, Cassian Braconnnier a écrit :
<blockquote cite="mid:4C9DEFC0.40107@free.fr" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
To say that Java is "higher level" than C++ is absolutely meaningless.<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote cite="mid:4C9DEFC0.40107@free.fr" type="cite"> <br>
C++ is on a par with Java as far as "level" is concerned.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Sorry to contradict you but no there are not, C++ has direct pointer
manipulation, no garbage collector, no introspection and no annotation.<br>
<br>
Sorry also for the ML, because this turn to be a technical discussion.<br>
</blockquote>
I am afraid I don't agree. Please read this thread (in French) on the
subject :
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.developpez.net/forums/d979620/c-cpp/cpp/langage/t-sens-dire-java-langage-plus-niveau-cpp/">http://www.developpez.net/forums/d979620/c-cpp/cpp/langage/t-sens-dire-java-langage-plus-niveau-cpp/</a><br>
However I agree this is too much of a technical issue to be discussed
on the list.<br>
Cheers.<br>
</body>
</html>
|
