blob: ccc6932094eca97e0ac2e9caf0fd4ce356b8a8fa (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Why not create a new format with the best of both worlds (if
possible)?<br>
<br>
.mageia ?<br>
<br>
Hoyt Duff skrev 2010-09-26 19:44:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTikB4oW2kPvk4Zsxyg4nZ2H1FmHHwWtAn=NRq_eG@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:13 AM, RAVI KUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAM
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ravikumar17jan@gmail.com"><ravikumar17jan@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">only thing i hate about mandriva is its rpm based packages
i prefer apt and deb personally
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""> I can understand a personal preference, but why do you believe that
deb is superior to rpm? Given that Mandriva is already rpm-based, what
benefit could be derived from abandoning the existing build system and
urpmi?
>From everything I have read, neither system has a clear advantage over
the other, and the end result of using either is essentially the same.
I don't believe that changing to a deb-based system would provide any
significant benefit to justify the expense in terms of re-training
devs and creating a new build system.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
|