blob: 5a8a54e8de6330c9f6312adb6ba49b6238d56bdd (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
|
I think that the first release of Magia have that be like Madriva. Modifications can be implemented in future releases.<div><br></div><div>Adjamilton Júnior<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/26 Kristoffer Grundström <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:kristoffer.grundstrom1983@gmail.com">kristoffer.grundstrom1983@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Why not create a new format with the best of both worlds (if
possible)?<br>
<br>
.mageia ?<br>
<br>
Hoyt Duff skrev 2010-09-26 19:44:
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><blockquote type="cite">
<pre>On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:13 AM, RAVI KUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAM
<a href="mailto:ravikumar17jan@gmail.com" target="_blank"><ravikumar17jan@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>only thing i hate about mandriva is its rpm based packages
i prefer apt and deb personally
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre> I can understand a personal preference, but why do you believe that
deb is superior to rpm? Given that Mandriva is already rpm-based, what
benefit could be derived from abandoning the existing build system and
urpmi?
>From everything I have read, neither system has a clear advantage over
the other, and the end result of using either is essentially the same.
I don't believe that changing to a deb-based system would provide any
significant benefit to justify the expense in terms of re-training
devs and creating a new build system.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
|
