1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
|
<div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/21 Romain d'Alverny <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rdalverny@gmail.com">rdalverny@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 16:55, Marc Paré <<a href="mailto:marc@marcpare.com">marc@marcpare.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> [...]<br>
<div class="im">> In a perfect setup, the Mageia forums would have a localized section on<br>
> their own main forum board and manage the localized sections themselves. But<br>
> it doesn't sound like people want this. It sounds like people would rather<br>
> go to a <a href="http://localization.mageia.org" target="_blank">localization.mageia.org</a> (or <a href="http://mageia.org/localization" target="_blank">mageia.org/localization</a>) site where all<br>
> services are rendered in their language. It may, in fact, be easier to<br>
> manage things this way. The <a href="http://mageia.org" target="_blank">mageia.org</a> main site would essentially be the<br>
> hub (in English) where the flow of localized (language) were coordinated<br>
> through <a href="http://localized.mageia.org" target="_blank">localized.mageia.org</a> sites<br>
><br>
> Or am I hearing things wrong?<br>
<br>
</div>No, I guess you are hearing it right. Good idea as well for the<br>
monthly (or ad hoc) reporting principle, could be interesting and<br>
useful that way.<br>
<br>
I guess then we'll go for the mixed approach. Anyway, let's wait for<br>
the temp wiki setup and we'll dig through this.<br>
<br>
Thanks!<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Romain.<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Mageia-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Mageia-discuss@mageia.org">Mageia-discuss@mageia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss" target="_blank">https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>Similar to the (failed) mandriva assembly, huh?<br><br>I think it can be a good scheme. And comes with some "extras" like localized communities can "elect" their representative on the future associaton, and turns the "central hub" in a open discuss for them. If this scheme sucess, transparency and openess of the representative's discursons are guaranteed.<br>
|
