summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110712/a682adca/attachment-0001.html
blob: e2789f610f5154a3c7bfe6af0d50ec0cabc78e5a (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 09:38, Balcaen John <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:mikala@mageia.org">mikala@mageia.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

On Tuesday 12 July 2011 09:15:18 Eugeni Dodonov wrote:<br>
[...]<br>
<div class="im">&gt; &gt; Comments, proposals, shout ?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; If nobody objects, I could help with that. Mandriva certainly gave a large<br>
&gt; experience on how to integrate systemd into the system without killing<br>
&gt; traditional sysvinit alternative.<br>
&gt;<br>
</div>I don&#39;t have any objections ;o)<br>
Also since you work alot on it , why do we have some systemd files in<br>
initscripts ? (because i noticed that thoses files were moved  back to systemd<br>
package)<br>
<br></blockquote><div><br>Each package is free to provide its .service files for systemd, they are not tied to any development libraries or headers and such. In case of initscripts, there are (were?) many mandriva-specifics tricks which used to run on startup via rc.sysinit and similar approaches, so initscripts package looked as the best place to put them at the time I think.<br>

<br></div></div>-- <br>Eugeni Dodonov<br><a href="http://eugeni.dodonov.net/" target="_blank">http://eugeni.dodonov.net/</a><br>