blob: f789ae28670a17b871210094161623c73db6c349 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] About syslinux & libpng
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20About%20syslinux%20%26%20libpng&In-Reply-To=%3C4E8EA946.9080001%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008670.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="008653.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] About syslinux & libpng</H1>
<B>Guillaume Rousse</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20About%20syslinux%20%26%20libpng&In-Reply-To=%3C4E8EA946.9080001%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] About syslinux & libpng">guillomovitch at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Fri Oct 7 09:24:54 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008670.html">[Mageia-dev] About syslinux & libpng
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="008653.html">[Mageia-dev] [updates-announce] Package update: kernel-firmware-extra (nonfree)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#8672">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#8672">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#8672">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#8672">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 07/10/2011 01:44, Michael Scherer a écrit :
><i> So far, the 2 arguments ( or at least, those that I understood ) are :
</I>><i>
</I>><i> - there is others problem, so why should we fix this one ?
</I>><i> Which is just a bad reason.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> - that's intrusive, that translate to "we have to maintain it and that
</I>><i> take ressources", and I would say that maintainance would maybe less a
</I>><i> issue if we pushed the change to upstream ( or at least correctly
</I>><i> explain our problem with bundling library, and given similar policies
</I>><i> exist for Fedora and Debian
</I>><i> ( <A HREF="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries</A> ), that
</I>><i> should not be a too orthodox point of view . But yes, maintainance is a
</I>><i> issue.
</I>You're missing the point: this is not 'statically linking against a
private version of a library instead of dynamically linking the system
one', but 'statically linking against a private version of a library
instead of statically linking againt the system one', which makes the
comparaison cases slightly biased.
--
Guillaume
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008670.html">[Mageia-dev] About syslinux & libpng
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="008653.html">[Mageia-dev] [updates-announce] Package update: kernel-firmware-extra (nonfree)
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#8672">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#8672">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#8672">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#8672">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|