1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Update%20of%20backport%2C%20policy%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C1309081127.22020.252.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006025.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="006077.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal</H1>
<B>Michael Scherer</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Update%20of%20backport%2C%20policy%20proposal&In-Reply-To=%3C1309081127.22020.252.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal">misc at zarb.org
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Jun 26 11:38:46 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006025.html">[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="006077.html">[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6030">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6030">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6030">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6030">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 à 11:49 +0300, Sander Lepik a écrit :
><i> 24.06.2011 03:15, Michael Scherer kirjutas:
</I>><i> > Hi,
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > [ ... ]
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Last solution, declare that cherry picking is not supported, or that
</I>><i> > people are on their own, and explain the reason. However, people have
</I>><i> > been asking this, and recommend this. This would also be against a goal
</I>><i> > of having confidence in the backports.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Again, and as said in the title, this is a proposal so feel free to
</I>><i> > comment.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> Reading comments here and knowing that our QA team is in trouble already - i don't see how
</I>><i> would QA handle backports. I can also see that there might come time when backports are
</I>><i> unpatched and thus unsecure.
</I>
At what point is QA team mentioned in the process ( which is in another
thread ) ?
--
Michael Scherer
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006025.html">[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="006077.html">[Mageia-dev] Update of backport, policy proposal
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6030">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6030">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6030">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6030">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
