zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005796.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Question%20about%20backports%3A%20calibre%20%28bug%201659%29&In-Reply-To=%3CBANLkTimV%3DE%2BBV4HcWh9JqFmVgByHqrDLkw%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="005653.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="005474.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)</H1>
    <B>Thierry Vignaud</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Question%20about%20backports%3A%20calibre%20%28bug%201659%29&In-Reply-To=%3CBANLkTimV%3DE%2BBV4HcWh9JqFmVgByHqrDLkw%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)">thierry.vignaud at gmail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Fri Jun 17 11:24:22 CEST 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005653.html">[Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005474.html">[Mageia-dev]  Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#5796">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#5796">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#5796">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#5796">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On 13 June 2011 11:51, Radu-Cristian FOTESCU &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">beranger5ca at yahoo.ca</A>&gt; wrote:
&gt;<i> Therefore, I strongly believe that all calibre updates be packaged into updates, not backports, especially as there isn't any Mageia 2.0 as of yet. Once Mageia 2.0 is released, whatever newer calibre releases will be available might go into backports instead -- if at all. (Although I'd say that it should still be updated to updates for the whole supported time of 1.0.)
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> What do you think?
</I>
I think that before thinking of updating or backporting that new version,
you could start by actually update the package in cauldron so that:
1) it can be tested...
2) we're sure we won't have packages in mga1/updates newer that those
of mga2/release
</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005653.html">[Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005474.html">[Mageia-dev]  Release cycles proposals, and discussion
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#5796">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#5796">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#5796">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#5796">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>