summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-December/010315.html
blob: daff77097c5814c8a21f8b4e91af0dccc5a67291 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Build-in or stand-alone module for X to support Y
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Build-in%20or%20stand-alone%20module%20for%20X%20to%20support%20Y&In-Reply-To=%3C4EE3594A.2040406%40gmx.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="010313.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="010316.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Build-in or stand-alone module for X to support Y</H1>
    <B>Kamil Rytarowski</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Build-in%20or%20stand-alone%20module%20for%20X%20to%20support%20Y&In-Reply-To=%3C4EE3594A.2040406%40gmx.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Build-in or stand-alone module for X to support Y">n54 at gmx.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Sat Dec 10 14:06:18 CET 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010313.html">[Mageia-dev] Build-in or stand-alone module for X to support Y
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="010316.html">[Mageia-dev] Build-in or stand-alone module for X to support Y
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#10315">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#10315">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#10315">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#10315">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>W dniu 10.12.2011 13:45, Maarten Vanraes pisze:
&gt;<i> Op zaterdag 10 december 2011 13:12:52 schreef Kamil Rytarowski:
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Hello!
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Situation:
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> A package X may have support for a package Y, by a module as a build in
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> X or stand-alone package. All modules are possible to turn-on and to
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> turn-off in a menu of X.
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> And there is a discussion because there is no Y at all in Mageia.
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Person A says:
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - include the module, even if there is no Y in Mageia (and maybe never
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> will be included), because an end-user can install Y from alternative
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> source or compile it from sources; and don't add Suggests/Requires for Y
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> in the package, because it's obvious that this is to support Y; also
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> installing Y from alternative sources/self-compilation is much simpler
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> than reinstalling X with support for Y
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Person B says:
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - don't include the module, because Y is a dependency for the module of
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> X - and we don't ship broken packages that aren't self-contained; so it
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> must be excluded from X or the nobody has package Y and maintain it
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Neither A nor B want to work with Y package.
</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Who is right?
</I>&gt;<i> imho, if Y is wanted by some people, and X works more of less fine without Y
</I>&gt;<i> even if it's support is compiled, and sometimes a get-Y package is fine.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> imho it's maintainer's preference, if maintainer is fine to also &quot;support the
</I>&gt;<i> Y-module for X&quot; even if depends on Y and Y is not allowed in mageia, or even
</I>&gt;<i> if Y is in nonfree... it's fine by me.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> let's get into specifics:
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>Well here there is no nonfree, demo, shareware, license issue. Just Y is 
yet another media-player. Importing Y is not a case for neiher A nor B.
There is a question to include or not include a module (as an external 
package %{name}-module-mediaplayer_Y) for X. X is working perfectly 
without Y - Y is just adding some extra features. But the module for X 
is NOT working without Y. Well it's probably not breaking X, there will 
be an error message &quot;error loading module-mediaplayer_Y&quot;.
</PRE>

































<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="010313.html">[Mageia-dev] Build-in or stand-alone module for X to support Y
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="010316.html">[Mageia-dev] Build-in or stand-alone module for X to support Y
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#10315">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#10315">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#10315">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#10315">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>