[Mageia-dev] [changelog] [RPM] cauldron core/release kdenlive-0.8.2-1.mga2
Florian Hubold
doktor5000 at arcor.de
Thu Dec 15 20:51:12 CET 2011
Am 15.12.2011 20:24, schrieb Maarten Vanraes:
> Op donderdag 15 december 2011 19:25:22 schreef Florian Hubold:
>> Am 15.12.2011 00:16, schrieb Maarten Vanraes:
>>> if QA doesn't have time to do these extreeme testing, then it shouldn't
>>> be done. and only backport.
>>>
>>> i guess that's my pov
>> For backports the same QA would be mandatory. How is that a solution?
>> Backports is not the place to drop untested updates, it's just for
>> everything else than pure bugfix or security updates.
> For backports QA is mandatory, but not in the same level, or it would be
> updates... it's imho also not doable to test this just as well as updates.
Huh? From what i remember the only difference between backports
and updates should be that backports are mostly new versions,
new features, but the QA should be the same. If that's not the case,
seems my memory from the last few meetings played tricks on me.
If the only QA test for backports shall be: try if it installs and
opens up without problems, then we should discuss this again.
>
>
> backports is a new version. it means it's an upgrade project for people. it
> means you will backup your files and test it first, then put into production.
Are you sure each one who would use backports would see this
the same way as you? IMHO they'll be: Cool, a new version, must install ...
>
>> Just do a full backup, try the rebuilt update, and if it's really not OK
>> revert to the older packages and your backup. Everything else seems
>> to foggy to me.
> myeah, how many people do that when applying the daily updates? i wonder...
That was specifically meant for you, not for everyday updates, also
this is no everyday update. If you're brave enough you can also try to do without
those safety measures, but then don't complain afterwards nobody warned you ...
More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list