From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002769.html | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002769.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002769.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002769.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002769.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..865c47572 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002769.html @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] cleaning old architecutres in glibc and elsewhere + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] cleaning old architecutres in glibc and elsewhere

+ andre999 + andr55 at laposte.net +
+ Thu Feb 24 10:28:35 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
Dexter Morgan a écrit :
+>
+> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Tux99<tux99-mga at uridium.org>  wrote:
+>>
+>>
+>> What is to be gained by removing the support for these architectures?
+>>
+>> I would say if it doesn't have any practical advantage (apart from 'code
+>> cleanliness') then I would keep them, even if nobody wants to support
+>> those archs now, you never know if someone might want to do it in the
+>> future.
+>>
+>> --
+>> Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
+>>
+>
+> this simply makes the spec file more readable and ease maitainance.
+>
+> This is for this that misc ask, but do you think ppl will do an alpha
+> or sparc port ?   if we need to add support for new arches i think
+> this have to be new ones ( ARM, MIPS, ... )
+>
+> my 2 cts
+
+Makes a lot of sense.  Cleaner spec files will easier to maintain.
+
+another 2 cents :)
+
+-- 
+André
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1