From 1be510f9529cb082f802408b472a77d074b394c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Vigier Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2013 13:46:12 +0000 Subject: Add zarb MLs html archives --- zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002766.html | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 77 insertions(+) create mode 100644 zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002766.html (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002766.html') diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002766.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002766.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9fece9c6f --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20110224/002766.html @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ + + + + [Mageia-dev] cleaning old architecutres in glibc and elsewhere + + + + + + + + + +

[Mageia-dev] cleaning old architecutres in glibc and elsewhere

+ Dexter Morgan + dmorganec at gmail.com +
+ Thu Feb 24 09:05:28 CET 2011 +

+
+ +
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:14 AM, Tux99 <tux99-mga at uridium.org> wrote:
+>
+>
+> What is to be gained by removing the support for these architectures?
+>
+> I would say if it doesn't have any practical advantage (apart from 'code
+> cleanliness') then I would keep them, even if nobody wants to support
+> those archs now, you never know if someone might want to do it in the
+> future.
+>
+> --
+> Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
+>
+
+this simply makes the spec file more readable and ease maitainance.
+
+This is for this that misc ask, but do you think ppl will do an alpha
+or sparc port ?   if we need to add support for new arches i think
+this have to be new ones ( ARM, MIPS, ... )
+
+my 2 cts
+
+ + + +
+

+ +
+More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list
+ -- cgit v1.2.1