summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002155.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002155.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002155.html195
1 files changed, 195 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002155.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002155.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..19d200709
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-sysadm/2011-January/002155.html
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-sysadm] [814] - add a module to generate gnupg key ( similar to the one for openssl
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5B814%5D%20-%20add%20a%20module%20to%20generate%20gnupg%20key%20%28%0A%20similar%20to%20the%20one%20for%20openssl&In-Reply-To=%3C1295281413.24697.62.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002154.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002156.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-sysadm] [814] - add a module to generate gnupg key ( similar to the one for openssl</H1>
+ <B>Michael Scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-sysadm%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20%5B814%5D%20-%20add%20a%20module%20to%20generate%20gnupg%20key%20%28%0A%20similar%20to%20the%20one%20for%20openssl&In-Reply-To=%3C1295281413.24697.62.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-sysadm] [814] - add a module to generate gnupg key ( similar to the one for openssl">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Mon Jan 17 17:23:33 CET 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002154.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [814] - add a module to generate gnupg key ( similar to the one for openssl
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002156.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [814] - add a module to generate gnupg key ( similar to the one for openssl
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2155">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2155">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2155">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2155">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le lundi 17 janvier 2011 &#224; 16:24 +0100, <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">root at mageia.org</A> a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> Revision: 814
+</I>&gt;<i> Author: misc
+</I>&gt;<i> Date: 2011-01-17 16:24:10 +0100 (Mon, 17 Jan 2011)
+</I>&gt;<i> Log Message:
+</I>&gt;<i> -----------
+</I>&gt;<i> - add a module to generate gnupg key ( similar to the one for openssl
+</I>&gt;<i> certs )
+</I>
+Ok so now we have the command to generate key, I propose to ... generate
+a key ( we can also party, if we prefer ).
+
+We have a few choice to consider :
+1) the size of the keys + algo
+
+2) the label of keys and other esthetic detail
+
+3) the number and usage of the keys
+
+4) how do we sign
+
+Feel free to repost this mail where it belong ( i think sysadm is a good
+choice, but I may be wrong ).
+
+Size of the keys :
+==================
+
+For 1, Debian, who is the organization that use the most intensively
+gnupg among free software user recommend to use RSA 4096 keys
+( <A HREF="http://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning">http://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning</A> &amp;
+<A HREF="http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/09/msg00003.html">http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2010/09/msg00003.html</A> ).
+
+So I propose to follow them, RSA. 4096, SHA-2, if supported by our
+version of rpm.
+
+Number and usage of the keys :
+==============================
+
+On Fedora, there is 1 key per release on the main repository.
+
+On Mandriva, there is 1 key for cooker, 1 key for stable, 1 key for
+security ( and also older keys ).
+
+For PLF, there is 1 key for all.
+( didn't check for opensuse, but I doubt they diverge from theses 3
+schemes )
+
+1 key for all is the simplest solution, as this is easiest, and do not
+requires a lot of work to update keys. There is also a simpler BS.
+However, this mean we cannot expire the keys. But this also mean that we
+can more easily have it signed, if we make it signed once, and do not
+need to redo it every time. ( see the gpg web of trust ).
+
+
+People have told me that having separate keys for cooker and stable
+permit to warn people when they install a rpm from cooker. Personally, I
+think this doesn't prevent much, an a downside is that people may still
+install rpm from N+1 on version N, so that lacks coherency.
+
+I see not much value into having different keys for secteam than the
+others, now that the community is everywhere.
+
+Moreover, using 1 key for stable and 1 for devel requires us to resign
+every package, and that always was a time consuming task, who caused
+trouble in the past ( like problem resigning openoffice ).
+The same issue regarding expiration apply.
+
+
+Option 3, 1 key for each release permit to have the benefit of
+separation, and allow us to sign package on the go ( and so notice
+problem sooner ). However, this requires us to rebuild everything once
+before the release ( may not be nice for mirrors, as told by Buchan
+several time ). Another advantage is to be able to expires keys, and
+adapt us to the growth of computing power quite seamlessly. And we will
+be less impacted in case of keys being compromised.
+
+A disadvantage is that we will have more work to have it certified ( if
+we want to have it signed ). I was thinking of signing the key every
+year by debian, ubuntu, fedora and opensuse people, but with this
+scheme, it is not gonna work well.
+
+According to <A HREF="http://www.awe.com/mark/blog/200701300906.html">http://www.awe.com/mark/blog/200701300906.html</A> , RH use a
+master key that sign the release keys. So doing like this would allow us
+to ask for signing the master key, we can renew it when needed, and we
+use it to sign the release key. ( RH also have a HSM for that :
+<A HREF="http://iss.thalesgroup.com/en/Products/Hardware%20Security%">http://iss.thalesgroup.com/en/Products/Hardware%20Security%</A>
+20Modules/nShield%20Solo.aspx , but there is no price tag. If someone by
+chance know some Thales insider, it would be interesting to have more
+information ).
+
+Labels and details
+===================
+Obviously, that's where I expect bike-shedding. I do not care of the
+name, but obviously, it has to match how we use the key. And I would
+suggest to make root@$domain for the email, and a generic stuff for the
+real name.
+
+I also guess we should upload it on a public key server.
+
+How do we sign
+==============
+
+Again, point 3 have a impact here. Either we sign when uploaded, using
+youri, or using a custom action ( as current one do not permit to change
+uid ), or we use some custom cronjob to sign.
+
+Or we sign when the release is made.
+
+I would recommend using a custom action, as privilege separation sound
+like a good idea. I would prefer to avoid signing again the day of
+release, for reasons that were already given.
+
+
+Bonus, usage of the module :
+============================
+
+ gnupg::keys { &quot;cauldron&quot;:
+ email =&gt; &quot;root@$domain&quot;,
+ key_name =&gt; &quot;John the plop&quot;,
+ key_length =&gt; &quot;4096&quot;
+ }
+
+create a key cauldron.sec and cauldron.pub in /etc/gnupg/keys/. I am not
+sure of the format ( maybe have it exported would be good ), and I am
+not sure that putting everything in this directory is the good location.
+
+--
+Michael Scherer
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002154.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [814] - add a module to generate gnupg key ( similar to the one for openssl
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002156.html">[Mageia-sysadm] [814] - add a module to generate gnupg key ( similar to the one for openssl
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2155">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2155">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2155">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2155">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-sysadm">More information about the Mageia-sysadm
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>