1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a2cde751c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20110607/00ffb900/attachment.html
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
+<html>
+  <head>
+    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
+      http-equiv="Content-Type">
+    <title></title>
+  </head>
+  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
+    Le 07/06/2011 10:00, Olav Vitters a &eacute;crit&nbsp;:
+    <blockquote cite="mid:20110607080033.GA5019@bkor.dhs.org"
+      type="cite">
+      <pre wrap="">On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:48:55AM +0200, Thomas Lottmann wrote:
+</pre>
+      <blockquote type="cite">
+        <pre wrap="">On the other hand, I'd like to still have the possibility to keep
+and install Gnome 2.xx in the future, as Gnome 3 isn't both stable
+and reliable and complete yet.
+</pre>
+      </blockquote>
+      <pre wrap="">
+GNOME 2.x is not needed, there is the fallback mode in GNOME3; it'll
+give you a gnome-panel and so on. The default layout looks like
+GNOME-shell, but it just is a newer gnome-panel.
+
+Regarding GNOME 3 not being reliable, can you reference some bugreports?
+This as I don't see any huge problems, especially not for a .0 release.
+</pre>
+    </blockquote>
+    <font face="Liberation Sans"><br>
+      The falback mode still relies qui a lot on Gnome 3. I concede I
+      need to do some more testing on a longer period of time, but on
+      the two computer using a SuSE based system running Gnome 3, I had
+      quite a lot numerous visual issues and got one program crashing.
+      But some time has passed and there were probably updates so I need
+      to retest. <br>
+      <br>
+      But looking at the available environments, I'm thinking that in
+      case some people really can't handle Gnome 3, there is actually
+      Xfce that can be a good fallback. I'm not sure there are enough
+      people for maintaining Gnome 2.32 for six extra months. I am
+      simply cautions about releases that may not be really polished and
+      stable. <br>
+    </font>
+  </body>
+</html>