summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/528bb30f/attachment.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/528bb30f/attachment.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/528bb30f/attachment.html68
1 files changed, 68 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/528bb30f/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/528bb30f/attachment.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3dc67c466
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100921/528bb30f/attachment.html
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Per Řyvind Karlsen <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:peroyvind@mandriva.org">peroyvind@mandriva.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+2010/9/21 Frank Griffin &lt;<a href="mailto:ftg@roadrunner.com">ftg@roadrunner.com</a>&gt;:<br>
+<div><div></div><div class="h5">&gt; Jostein Hauge wrote:<br>
+&gt;&gt;<br>
+&gt;&gt; If Laprévote invites to collaboration to make a foundation, then this should<br>
+&gt;&gt; be looked into regardless of your personal feelings. I think most of us<br>
+&gt;&gt; would<br>
+&gt;&gt; love a solution like Fedora-Redhat.<br>
+&gt;&gt;<br>
+&gt;&gt; The name Mageia and the foundation might be kept. But what good does it make<br>
+&gt;&gt; to have a new Cooker, new build system or bugzilla? If collaboration between<br>
+&gt;&gt; Mandriva and Mageia is possible, then please collaborate.<br>
+&gt;&gt;<br>
+&gt;&gt; When someone reach out a hand, don&#39;t turn your back on it. Instead you could<br>
+&gt;&gt; indicate what you think would be needed in order to make collaboration<br>
+&gt;&gt; possible. Just saying &#39;no I wont collaborate at all&#39; makes this look more<br>
+&gt;&gt; like<br>
+&gt;&gt; a vendetta than a constructive initiative.<br>
+&gt;&gt;<br>
+&gt;&gt;<br>
+&gt; +1<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; The tone of these threads started as exciting and hopeful, but is going<br>
+&gt; downhill fast.<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; As with any business, MDV will do what&#39;s (perceived as) good for MDV,<br>
+&gt; whether or not that seems respectful to the community.  I&#39;d be the last<br>
+&gt; one to deny that without the community, MDV probably would have folded<br>
+&gt; long ago.  But I doubt they tell the shareholders that, so don&#39;t expect<br>
+&gt; their debt to the community to weigh heavily in policies created to<br>
+&gt; please shareholders.  They probably don&#39;t know we exist.<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; In this case, MDV (= Laprévote) seems to think that a foundation is good<br>
+&gt; for MDV, so I&#39;d have a lot more confidence that they will back it than I<br>
+&gt; would otherwise.  And once they go down that path, it would be very<br>
+&gt; difficult to reverse.<br>
+&gt;<br>
+&gt; No matter what your feelings about Mandriva management might be,<br>
+&gt; remember the old saying: &quot;the bread of one emperor is as sweet as the<br>
+&gt; bread of another&quot;.  If MDV is willing to pony up the resources to host a<br>
+&gt; foundation of the type in which you&#39;re interested, *and* are willing to<br>
+&gt; let the community control it, just go forward from there.<br>
+</div></div>You loose the fact that I raised this issue and invited for discussion<br>
+on this, and also there&#39;s been a general total consensus about the<br>
+benefits and gains of a foundation and overwhelming interest in the<br>
+whole thing.<br>
+<br>
+The issue here isn&#39;t that Mandriva is only interested in the<br>
+foundation out of it&#39;s own interest, but rather about the fact that<br>
+Romain is against anything related to Mandriva out of his own personal<br>
+vendetta.<br>
+<br>
+This isn&#39;t something originally coming from the management of the<br>
+company, it&#39;s been something first proposed around the beginning of<br>
+the century by Gäel Duval, and that has since been resurfaced for<br>
+discussion and being pushed from the community itself for quite a<br>
+while!<br>
+<br>
+<br>
+--<br>
+Regards,<br>
+<font color="#888888">Per Řyvind<br>
+</font></blockquote></div><br><br>
+Well from my (Unity Linux) perspective I&#39;m hoping for an independent SCM repository
+as well. This is the perfect time to take advantage of an independent SCM and allow everyone to share ~90% of the same code and see where branching can be taken advantage of, but as
+ mentioned before it would take an entity with some resources to deploy it. (Hint hint Arnaud) I heard a comment of about 600GB is needed to basically re-host the
+Mandriva svn and to account for growth.<br><br>Much of these nasty low blows about my past employment/employees etc, is just not classy nor constructive to really form a new community and from that, then a distribution. It just doesn&#39;t work that way. It&#39;s obvious that many of the nay-sayers may have no clue on what it takes to roll/spin/create a distro and the enormous amount of setup and organization that goes into it. So I&#39;m not going to address them. <br>
+<br>So what do we say? Can we get something going here? A comment from all?<br><br>Regards,<br>Matthew Dawkins<br><br><br>