summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101017/002439.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101017/002439.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101017/002439.html179
1 files changed, 179 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101017/002439.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101017/002439.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cddbe98a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101017/002439.html
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Mageia logo proposals and selection
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mageia%20logo%20proposals%20and%20selection&In-Reply-To=%3C4CBB1DB0.7090002%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002438.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="002440.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Mageia logo proposals and selection</H1>
+ <B>andr&#233;</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mageia%20logo%20proposals%20and%20selection&In-Reply-To=%3C4CBB1DB0.7090002%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Mageia logo proposals and selection">andr55 at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sun Oct 17 18:00:48 CEST 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002438.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia logo proposals and selection
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002440.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia logo proposals and selection
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2439">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2439">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2439">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2439">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Graham Lauder a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> On Thursday 14 Oct 2010 20:28:38 Olivier M&#233;jean wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Being the best linux distro is not enough nowadays, we must let it know
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> widely and do feel that Mageia is not yet another distribution among
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> hundreds of distribution. Mageia is your future distribution even if you
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> don't know it yet ! :)
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> And that is a fallacy of thinking, we should not be competing against other
+</I>&gt;<i> distros, we compete against MS
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>I agree to a degree - but there are 2 things we need to attract to
+Mageia - ordinary users, who will not contribute more that bug reports
+at best - and active contributors.
+The former would hopefully come largely from the Ms (and why not Apple)
+world, but the latter almost surely will be largely from the
+Linux/Unix/BSD world. That doesn't necessarily mean that they will
+cease contributing to their current distro, as many contributors
+participate in more than one distro. But their support will be
+essential if Mageia is to make big inroads.
+&gt;&gt;<i> Anyway, i don't think we can just transpose what's done for OOo to Mageia.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> OOo just compete to MS Office, Mageia compete to hundreds of Linux
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Distribution, and other OS, not quite the same scale.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> You are kidding of course, OOo competes in a very competitive environment.
+</I>&gt;<i> KOffice, Gnome Office just in the Linux space, then on windows we're up
+</I>&gt;<i> against Wordperfect, who have huge history in the space, Lotus Symphony, MS
+</I>&gt;<i> Works etc. In the Linux space, Mageia competes with a whole pile small
+</I>&gt;<i> players in a small market. Total is around 1.5% of the total OS market, then
+</I>&gt;<i> there is 3.5 % for Mac and the rest MS.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>KOffice - the reviews I've seen show that it lacks a lot compared with
+OOo. As well, it requires installing most of the KDE desktop, which is
+huge. And not nearly as widely used as Gnome.
+Gnome Office is a dream. (Or nightmare, depending on your point of
+view.) It barely works. A very basic word processor, and basic
+spreadsheet. No presentation. No database. No drawing module.
+In the Ms environment, Ms-office is very expensive, even the minimal
+version. Wordperfect suite is less expensive, but still paid. Athough
+very nice, it has retreated to a niche market, and is not widely used.
+Ms-works is free but nowhere near as complete as OOo.
+Lotus suite is also free, but had almost disappeared.
+So essentially, OOo has no serious competition in the Linux world.
+In the Ms environment, it is free vs paid, or more functional than its
+competitors.
+
+Now lets consider operating systems. Since Ms comes preinstalled on
+virtually all new computers, it is preceived as free by end-users. So
+Linux being free is not perceived as advantageous.
+Even though it takes longer to install Ms-windows than Mandriva, since
+users would rarely install Ms-windows, the time it takes to install
+Linux is seen as an impediment. As well, although the name Linux is
+generally known, detailed information for supporting Linux is generally
+unknown, even though (Mandriva) Linux has more or less equivalent
+fonctionality.
+&gt;<i> Now the following is my opinion only to be taken with grain of salt or
+</I>&gt;<i> whatever condiment you prefer.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> We are in the desktop computing market, the chunk we want a part of is at
+</I>&gt;<i> present occupied by MS.
+</I>Agreed.
+&gt;<i> In this market the name we want to promote is Mageia,
+</I>&gt;<i> we have no need to identify with Linux.
+</I>Not agreed. Since the name Linux is often known, even though details
+are generally unknown, associating Mageia with Linux lets more people
+know what kind of animal (so to speak) Mageia is.
+This has 2 advantages. The increased familiarity should lower any
+resistance to trying Mageia, for those Ms users who are open to trying
+something new.
+And contributors to other Linux/Unix/BSD distros are more likely to
+contribute to Mageia, even if they continue to actively support their
+current distro.
+If you are thinking of Ubuntu, don't forget that they started with paid
+promotion &#224; la Microsoft, so it hardly parallels Mageia's situation.
+&gt;<i> I have no problem helping the others
+</I>&gt;<i> into the market but we need to focus on MS users. If we happen to increase
+</I>&gt;<i> the market for Linux then great but our focus should be on Mageia. Right now
+</I>&gt;<i> there are too many distros, linux is confusing to the market, we have no need
+</I>&gt;<i> to identify with it.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>Most other distros target niche markets, and are oriented to hackers or
+those fed up with Ms's agressive and anti-competitive marketing. There
+are relatively few distros which have the strengths of Mandriva (which
+Mageia will inherit) and the community orientation of Mageia. A major
+weakness of Mandriva has been a lack of focus in its promotion,
+particularly outside the Linux community, and of course the inherent
+conflict between community and commercial focus.
+So yes, a focus (among others) on attracting current Ms users (who
+likely will dual-boot), but let's not forget the Linux community, which
+is a large part of strengths of Mandriva (and now Mageia).
+&gt;<i> Our goal should be be seen as the primary alternative to the encumbent leader
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>Or a major alternative. Ubuntu is not going to disappear.
+&gt;<i> Focus on why we are better and tell the world.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>But not with the blatent egosism of Ms.
+&gt;<i> When the Steve gets people making videos like this
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://blogs.technet.com/b/whymicrosoft/archive/2010/10/05/15-customers-who-">http://blogs.technet.com/b/whymicrosoft/archive/2010/10/05/15-customers-who-</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> switched-to-microsoft-office-after-evaluating-openoffice-org.aspx
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> but focused on Mageia then we know we've made it
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>Like most Ms negative presentations, it is totally oriented to the
+businesses, who are less concerned with the cost of acquisition than the
+supposed cost of paid support. Pure FUD, with barely a pretence of
+presentation of facts. As a community distro, our focus is not
+businesses wanting paid support.
+If we are openly associated with Linux in our approach to Ms users, Ms
+will have a lot tougher target. Note that despite FUD against Linux, Ms
+does, in various ways, offer limited support for Linux as well. They
+realise that Linux is not going away any time soon, and it is in their
+interests to cooperate to some degree.
+&gt;&gt;<i> Olivier
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Cheers
+</I>&gt;<i> GL
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>
+my 2 cents
+- Andr&#233; (andre999)
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002438.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia logo proposals and selection
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002440.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia logo proposals and selection
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#2439">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#2439">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#2439">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#2439">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>