diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120527/3ce93a66')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120527/3ce93a66/attachment-0001.html | 22 | ||||
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120527/3ce93a66/attachment.html | 22 |
2 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120527/3ce93a66/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120527/3ce93a66/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..55a80eb8c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120527/3ce93a66/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +<p>Le 27 mai 2012 04:33, "Franklin Weng" <<a href="mailto:franklin@goodhorse.idv.tw">franklin@goodhorse.idv.tw</a>> a écrit :<br> +[...]</p> +<p>> Now my question is that, will the KDE update policy in<br> +> backports be still the same as before?<br> +><br> +> I remember that when discussing if Mageia 1 would have KDE 4.7 in<br> +> backports, the answer was no because that kdepim was too unstable.</p> +<p>It was part of the problem & used to show that it was not that easy to do it.</p> +<p>[...]</p> +<p>> For Mageia 2, again I'd like to ask, if we will have KDE 4.9 in<br> +> backports after it releases in August?<br> +><br> +> (Yes, I know that I can upgrade my KDE using cauldron. But no, I<br> +> don't consider to upgrade my box with cauldron... it is far too<br> +> unstable than any version of kdepim.)</p> +<p>So here we've got some problems:<br> +- Backports are not functional.<br> +- Kde is still too big for a backport especially regarding our current (draft) backport policy where it should be validated by our QA. Not to mention that we'll have to update/backport somes dependencies to allow this.<br> + +- I personally won't push it to backport.</p> +<p>Regards,<br> +</p> diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120527/3ce93a66/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120527/3ce93a66/attachment.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..55a80eb8c --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20120527/3ce93a66/attachment.html @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +<p>Le 27 mai 2012 04:33, "Franklin Weng" <<a href="mailto:franklin@goodhorse.idv.tw">franklin@goodhorse.idv.tw</a>> a écrit :<br> +[...]</p> +<p>> Now my question is that, will the KDE update policy in<br> +> backports be still the same as before?<br> +><br> +> I remember that when discussing if Mageia 1 would have KDE 4.7 in<br> +> backports, the answer was no because that kdepim was too unstable.</p> +<p>It was part of the problem & used to show that it was not that easy to do it.</p> +<p>[...]</p> +<p>> For Mageia 2, again I'd like to ask, if we will have KDE 4.9 in<br> +> backports after it releases in August?<br> +><br> +> (Yes, I know that I can upgrade my KDE using cauldron. But no, I<br> +> don't consider to upgrade my box with cauldron... it is far too<br> +> unstable than any version of kdepim.)</p> +<p>So here we've got some problems:<br> +- Backports are not functional.<br> +- Kde is still too big for a backport especially regarding our current (draft) backport policy where it should be validated by our QA. Not to mention that we'll have to update/backport somes dependencies to allow this.<br> + +- I personally won't push it to backport.</p> +<p>Regards,<br> +</p> |