diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111017/e5e5fec6/attachment-0001.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111017/e5e5fec6/attachment-0001.html | 111 |
1 files changed, 111 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111017/e5e5fec6/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111017/e5e5fec6/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..bf951b511 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20111017/e5e5fec6/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> +<html> + <head> + <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" + http-equiv="Content-Type"> + </head> + <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> + On 16/10/2011 22:33, Thomas Spuhler wrote: + <blockquote cite="mid:201110161333.06594.thomas@btspuhler.com" + type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On Sunday, October 16, 2011 04:05:52 am Giuseppe Ghibò wrote: +</pre> + <blockquote type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On 26/09/2011 17:34, Anssi Hannula wrote: +</pre> + <blockquote type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On 26.09.2011 15:47, nicolas vigier wrote: +</pre> + <blockquote type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">On Sat, 24 Sep 2011, Thomas Spuhler wrote: +</pre> + <blockquote type="cite"> + <pre wrap="">But are you sure about texlive providing it? +</pre> + </blockquote> + <pre wrap=""> +I don't know. It looks like it's not in the texlive package. +</pre> + </blockquote> + <pre wrap=""> +My impression (from a few years back I think) is that standalone +texi2html is the texlive-era replacement for tetex-texi2html. +</pre> + </blockquote> + <pre wrap=""> +It's not like this. The misalignment in having multiple versions comes +from having different source of packages. tetex had it's own texi2html +(so I guess texlive), which is certified and well QA and integrated with +that tetex version, so it provides "texi2html". At a certain point newer +versions of texi2html were placed in contrib because they were newer +(there were also other packages in this situation, xdvi, prosper, etc.) +and because of not touching the main tetex package. To handle this kind +of misalignment a good way to proceed would be to go in the main package +providing it (i.e. tetex/texlive) and try to merge the newer texi2html +with the new one, then redoing the tests. This often doesn't happen +because it takes a lot of amount of time, and require to handle with the +main and bigger package (texlive/tetex), and people often don't do this +if they are doing "snack packaging". + +The other way, which is to transform everything as "pluggable" (e.g. +split packages at source, so for instance not having tetex providing +texi2html) IMHO doesn't provide the same amount of certification, +because the packager (packager not necessarely means the maintainer) +just upgrade the version number, without taking care of re-testing, and +in case he doesn't know in deep about that package what he does as side +effect is to give away the upstream tetex/texlive certification +(certification that the included, so older, texi2html package works well +and has no flaws with the rest of the tetex/texlive distro) in favour of +a newer version (hoping that if something goes wrong or of some bug some +end-user would file a bug on bugzilla...). + +Bye. +G. +</pre> + </blockquote> + <pre wrap="">Thanks for the explanation. +It seems you are pretty versed in texlive. Would you mind to look as why +muscore doesn't build anymore with the current texlive: +Font metrics written on mscore1-20.tfm. +Output written on mscore1-20.600gf (18 characters, 7172 bytes). +Transcript written on mscore1-20.log. +This is MetaPost, version 1.504 (kpathsea version 6.0.1) +(../mf2pt1.mp (/usr/share/texmf-dist/metapost/base/mfplain.mp +Preloading the plain base, version 0.99: preliminaries, + basic constants and mathematical macros, + macros for converting units, + macros and tables for various modes of operation, + macros for drawing and filling, + macros for proof labels and rules, + macros for character and font administration, +and a few last-minute items.)) +Transcript written on mf2pt1.log. +Invoking "mpost -mem=mf2pt1 -progname=mpost '\mode:=localfont; mag:=100; +bpppix 0.02; input feta20.mf'"... + +Sorry, I can't find the 'mf2pt1' preload file; will try 'plain'.This is +MetaPost, version 1.504 (kpathsea version 6.0.1) +(plain.mp + +It lloks as if mf2pt1 is missing, The script is available on it's own, put old +texlive and tetex didn't show this problem. + +</pre> + </blockquote> + I've not an installation with the package you are talking about + handy to check myself, but you may try to add the following line to + the file `kpsewhich fmtutil.cnf` (backtick included):<br> + <br> + mpost mf2pt1 - + -translate-file=cp227.tcx mf2pt1.mp<br> + <br> + (of course the file mf2pt1.mp should be provided somewhere [it's in + CTAN:<cite>tex-archive/support/<b>mf2pt1</b></cite><span class="std">]</span>), + and then recreate the missed file with: fmtutil --missing (or + --all).<br> + <br> + Bye<br> + Giuseppe.<br> + <br> + </body> +</html> |