diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110617/0a76ff20/attachment-0001.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110617/0a76ff20/attachment-0001.html | 53 |
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110617/0a76ff20/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110617/0a76ff20/attachment-0001.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3569a555b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/attachments/20110617/0a76ff20/attachment-0001.html @@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> +<html> + <head> + <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" + http-equiv="Content-Type"> + </head> + <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff"> + by <strong><a +href="https://forums.mageia.org/en/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=77" + style="color: rgb(0, 0, 204);" class="username-coloured">wobo</a></strong> + » Jun 17th, '11, 18:50 + <div class="content">Several points jumped through my synapses + reading Trio3b's post.<br> + <br> + A thought I had many times before: are the users ready for such + Linux distributions? I do not mean any technical skills, no user + is supposed to learn how to create scripts and configure things by + editing config files any more. But I often see that users lack the + mindset, the way of thinking which is required by administrating + your own *nix system. One nice example was the KDE switch to 4.x + which Trio3b described as fiasco. But was this fiasco not really + caused by the users demand for "the latest" although KDE stated + that 4.0 (and a few following versions) were not for userland? + With the proper mindset users without development skills would + have stayed away from KDE 4 until it was declared as + "userland-ready", which was with 4.2 [1]. This is just one example + but could also be ported to other "fiascos".<br> + <br> + As often said, Linux is a system which forces the user to be a + sysadmin as well - but as a sysadmin you think different than a + user does. IMHO this is one point which is not communicated enough + to the user. Of course, marketing would have a fit seeing the + question "Are you ready to be a sysadmin?" all over the portal + site of our Linux distribution. But isn't this really the question + here when we talk about backports, updates, rolling releases and + all the rest? These are expressions and tasks for a sysadmin, not + a user. <br> + <br> + In business we do have IT departments and sysadmins who care for + those things - your average Dilbert in his cubicle is not supposed + to care for updates. But for the user at home we see this dual + personality with the different mindsets to be a given fact. Is + that so?<br> + <br> + As you can see, I did not aim at a certain conclusion here, I just + let my thoughts roam free (could well be an exposé for a editor's + article). <br> + <br> + [1] Of course, for the real "fiasco" we have to blame a certain + distribution as well which could not wait to be "the first to + offer the new KDE!" and thus caused other distributions to follow.</div> + </body> +</html> |