summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009155.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009155.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009155.html133
1 files changed, 133 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009155.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009155.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5085f2fc8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009155.html
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20E17%20packaging&In-Reply-To=%3C1319728240.2146.45.camel%40localhost%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009136.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="009158.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging</H1>
+ <B>Michael Scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20E17%20packaging&In-Reply-To=%3C1319728240.2146.45.camel%40localhost%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Thu Oct 27 17:10:40 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009136.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009158.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9155">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9155">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9155">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9155">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le mercredi 26 octobre 2011 &#224; 23:12 +0200, Florian Hubold a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> Am 26.10.2011 22:06, schrieb Michael Scherer:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Le mercredi 26 octobre 2011 &#224; 18:58 +0200, Florian Hubold a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; If keeping old releases unchanged from distro to distro version is
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; your vision of improving quality and more satisfying for our end-users,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; that's not my vision, sorry.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Then we should simply remove e17 altogether. Because, by choice of the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; developpers, it is not stable enough to be packaged.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> Yes, altogether that would be a logical conclusion, sadly but true.
+</I>&gt;<i> Seems some maintainers can actually be worse than infamous 'nobody'.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> How to deal with that on the upgrade to mga2 in packaging terms,
+</I>&gt;<i> display a message to E17 users to the extent of:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;... e17 has been removed to improve on mageia overall quality,
+</I>&gt;<i> please use another window manager / desktop environment ... &quot;
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> And please: this is meant as a serious question following the
+</I>&gt;<i> above conclusion ...
+</I>
+That's a good question but in fact, the situation is not really new.
+That's already something we should do for any software dropped.
+
+Either we drop because something do not work anymore ( for example,
+something unmaintained upstream, not rebuildable and no one able to fix
+), or we drop because we replace.
+
+Replacing is seamless and we do it quite often, dropping is not.
+
+I would propose that we add a conflict on mageia-release, and make a
+note in release notes. So on upgrade, package is removed, and people
+have documentation.
+
+
+Now, for the other problem of providing e17 without bypassing all our
+update procedure, there is several possible solutions :
+
+1) We could move that to another repository, outside of Mageia, with
+different rules until that's sutable to be integrated properly. 3rd
+parties repos are bad IMHO, but if people do not want to follow the
+policy for whatever reasons, that's unavoidable.
+
+2) We could find a way to not place some packages to stable release.
+That would be quite complex, but doable. This way, people could use e17,
+but only if they run cauldron. Thus, we are free of any
+support/stability requirement.
+
+3) We could ship the stable part ( ie, those with a tarball like eina,
+etc ) and provide a script to compile/install the missing part from
+svn, since this would also free use from support/stability requirement,
+and as a bonus, let anybody keep the newest version ( because again, I
+doubt that e17 developpers are interested into getting old bug reports,
+given past and current interactions ). Of course, we should warn people
+upon installation that they are on their own, that their e17 will be
+updated often ( for the same reason about developpers )
+. And of course, this assume that no updated tarball are needed for the
+stable part.
+
+There is several way, and that's just the ones I can think in 5 minutes.
+
+But e17 is a package that we always drop sooner or later, and once in a
+while, discovered again, and then dropped again.
+--
+Michael Scherer
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009136.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009158.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9155">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9155">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9155">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9155">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>