summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009132.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009132.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009132.html154
1 files changed, 154 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009132.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009132.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ce09b0083
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009132.html
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20E17%20packaging&In-Reply-To=%3C1319659586.2146.17.camel%40localhost%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009130.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="009136.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging</H1>
+ <B>Michael Scherer</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20E17%20packaging&In-Reply-To=%3C1319659586.2146.17.camel%40localhost%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging">misc at zarb.org
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Oct 26 22:06:26 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009130.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009136.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9132">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9132">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9132">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9132">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le mercredi 26 octobre 2011 &#224; 18:58 +0200, Florian Hubold a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> Am 26.10.2011 18:21, schrieb Michael scherer:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:45:21AM +0200, Florian Hubold wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; Am 26.10.2011 06:59, schrieb Michael Scherer:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; Le samedi 22 octobre 2011 &#224; 08:41 +0100, Philippe Reynes a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Hi,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; I've tried to use E17, but it's an old version. I've asked e17 team,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; and they answered me that E17 is &quot;rolling release&quot;. So no
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; stable release (or vert vert few).
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; I propose to package svn version, so we could be up-to-date.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; If a problem occurs, we could report it to upstream.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; What do you think about doing it on all E17 package ?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; How will it go for stable support ?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt; IE, once mageia 2 is out ?
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; We have better chances for bugfixes, don't think the snapshots which
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; we used till now ( nearly one year old and also only based on
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; the development release) will get some love anymore.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; For security issues, there were none that i'm aware of except for imlib2.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; There is at least one that I found and reported 2 times ( albeit not using the
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; public bugtracker ) that didn't get corrected, just look
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; at <A HREF="http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/elementary/src/lib/elm_map.c">http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/elementary/src/lib/elm_map.c</A>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; ( a little help : the issue is in the first 25 lines )
+</I>&gt;<i> You reported it two times. And as you happen to know the problem,
+</I>&gt;<i> may i ask where the fix is?
+</I>
+Ask to the e17 developpers. I reported it a 3rd time today on irc,
+because there is no other way to report issues ( ie, I cannot find any
+link to register on trac ). And while the fix is IMHO easy, I didn't
+cared much because the 2nd time should have been the good one.
+
+Now, let me repeat the question, because it was not answered, how do you
+plan to take care of e17, wether we update the snapshot or not ?
+
+e17 is typically the type of package where someone say &quot;it sound great,
+let's package it&quot;, and he does the job, and he update for each svn
+snapshot, and get bored, and drop it. It already happened a few time at
+Mandriva, and since it was in contribs, no one cared about stability or
+security.
+
+We do care, hence the question.
+
+
+&gt;<i> Also may i remind you that elementary is also
+</I>&gt;<i> contained in Mageia 1 and also contains the issue you mentioned?
+</I>&gt;<i> How is that better for quality or security?
+</I>
+Then if there is no proper way to support and unless someone has a
+better idea, we should drop it.
+
+&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; But if you argument this way, we should stay with the packages we have
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; until E17 is fully stable and release, but i don't see how this would be better.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; We cannot at the same time say
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &quot;we offer quality package and take care of fixing them&quot; and at the same time,
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; just say that we won't.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> We want to be nearer to upstream to improve package quality.
+</I>
+So shipping svn snapshot is package quality ?
+Never wondered why the only distributions to ship e17 officially are
+also those that have no commitment to a stable version ( ie rolling
+release ) ?
+
+&gt;<i> Who said we don't want to offer quality E17 packages and don't support them?
+</I>
+Ok so explain to me how to take care of the upgrade on stable release.
+And updating to a newer svn snapshot is already painful for firefox, so
+I doubt it will be better if we do that for 15 rpms.
+
+&gt;<i> If keeping old releases unchanged from distro to distro version is
+</I>&gt;<i> your vision of improving quality and more satisfying for our end-users,
+</I>&gt;<i> that's not my vision, sorry.
+</I>
+Then we should simply remove e17 altogether. Because, by choice of the
+developpers, it is not stable enough to be packaged.
+
+--
+Michael Scherer
+
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009130.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009136.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9132">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9132">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9132">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9132">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>