summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009130.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009130.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009130.html113
1 files changed, 113 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009130.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009130.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..57700d885
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009130.html
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20E17%20packaging&In-Reply-To=%3C4EA83C33.7000009%40arcor.de%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="009129.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="009132.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging</H1>
+ <B>Florian Hubold</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20E17%20packaging&In-Reply-To=%3C4EA83C33.7000009%40arcor.de%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging">doktor5000 at arcor.de
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Wed Oct 26 18:58:27 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009129.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009132.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9130">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9130">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9130">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9130">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Am 26.10.2011 18:21, schrieb Michael scherer:
+&gt;<i> On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 10:45:21AM +0200, Florian Hubold wrote:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Am 26.10.2011 06:59, schrieb Michael Scherer:
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Le samedi 22 octobre 2011 &#224; 08:41 +0100, Philippe Reynes a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> Hi,
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> I've tried to use E17, but it's an old version. I've asked e17 team,
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> and they answered me that E17 is &quot;rolling release&quot;. So no
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> stable release (or vert vert few).
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> I propose to package svn version, so we could be up-to-date.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> If a problem occurs, we could report it to upstream.
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> What do you think about doing it on all E17 package ?
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> How will it go for stable support ?
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i> IE, once mageia 2 is out ?
+</I>&gt;&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> We have better chances for bugfixes, don't think the snapshots which
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> we used till now ( nearly one year old and also only based on
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> the development release) will get some love anymore.
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> For security issues, there were none that i'm aware of except for imlib2.
+</I>&gt;<i> There is at least one that I found and reported 2 times ( albeit not using the
+</I>&gt;<i> public bugtracker ) that didn't get corrected, just look
+</I>&gt;<i> at <A HREF="http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/elementary/src/lib/elm_map.c">http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/elementary/src/lib/elm_map.c</A>
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> ( a little help : the issue is in the first 25 lines )
+</I>You reported it two times. And as you happen to know the problem,
+may i ask where the fix is? Also may i remind you that elementary is also
+contained in Mageia 1 and also contains the issue you mentioned?
+How is that better for quality or security?
+&gt;&gt;<i> But if you argument this way, we should stay with the packages we have
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> until E17 is fully stable and release, but i don't see how this would be better.
+</I>&gt;<i> We cannot at the same time say
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;we offer quality package and take care of fixing them&quot; and at the same time,
+</I>&gt;<i> just say that we won't.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>We want to be nearer to upstream to improve package quality.
+Who said we don't want to offer quality E17 packages and don't support them?
+
+If keeping old releases unchanged from distro to distro version is
+your vision of improving quality and more satisfying for our end-users,
+that's not my vision, sorry.
+</PRE>
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009129.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009132.html">[Mageia-dev] E17 packaging
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#9130">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#9130">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#9130">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#9130">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>