diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008590.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008590.html | 78 |
1 files changed, 78 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008590.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008590.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8ec91e36b --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008590.html @@ -0,0 +1,78 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20GNOME%203.2%20or%203.4%20for%20Mageia%202%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C20111001195820.GH11752%40bkor.dhs.org%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008577.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="008574.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?</H1> + <B>Olav Vitters</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20GNOME%203.2%20or%203.4%20for%20Mageia%202%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C20111001195820.GH11752%40bkor.dhs.org%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?">olav at vitters.nl + </A><BR> + <I>Sat Oct 1 21:58:20 CEST 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008577.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008574.html">[Mageia-dev] Mageia software development process (transfugdrake) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8590">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8590">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8590">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8590">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Dexter Morgan wrote: +><i> i think 3.4 would be a nice choice ut as told it depends of the +</I>><i> schedule. If you think this can be ok, i trust you. +</I> +GNOME schedule wise it is ok, I just don't know what things need to be +done from a distribution. e.g. iso file size.. we'll need to monitor +than continuously IMO + +><i> Is it doable to do like mikala for kde and do updates for gnome 3.4.x +</I>><i> during mageia lifecycle ? +</I> +Yeah, that is mandatory. We have to provide the stable updates. The more +people use software, the more bugs are found. So we have to provide +stable updates to fix everything that was found (no matter how much +testing you do in a group, if you have 50x the amount of users, they'll +find way more bugs). +-- +Regards, +Olav +</PRE> + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008577.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008574.html">[Mageia-dev] Mageia software development process (transfugdrake) +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8590">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8590">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8590">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8590">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |