diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008571.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008571.html | 111 |
1 files changed, 111 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008571.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008571.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..934c558fd --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008571.html @@ -0,0 +1,111 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20GNOME%203.2%20or%203.4%20for%20Mageia%202%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C20111001030608.GG11752%40bkor.dhs.org%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008568.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="008577.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?</H1> + <B>Olav Vitters</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20GNOME%203.2%20or%203.4%20for%20Mageia%202%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C20111001030608.GG11752%40bkor.dhs.org%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?">olav at vitters.nl + </A><BR> + <I>Sat Oct 1 05:06:08 CEST 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008568.html">[Mageia-dev] pm-utils and requires to bootloader-utils +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008577.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8571">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8571">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8571">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8571">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 05:52:06PM +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote: +><i> Le vendredi 30 septembre 2011 15:00:45, Olav Vitters a écrit : +</I>><i> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:33:59PM +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote: +</I>><i> > > However, how great is GNOME 3.4 going to be as compared to 3.2.2 ? :) +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > For me it is multiple things: +</I>><i> > 1. More stable; The more people use a recent version of GNOME, more +</I>><i> > fixes will go into GNOME and long term GNOME is more stable +</I>><i> > +</I>><i> > Basically: if your GNOME version is old, developers spend less time +</I>><i> > on it, because they assume the issue is probably fixed. So, IMO, to +</I>><i> > ensure GNOME stays at a high quality, you have to provide a recent +</I>><i> > version... staying 1 version behind only works for short term (the +</I>><i> > "Release early, release often" mindset). +</I>><i> +</I>><i> Did I misunderstand , or is GNOME 3.2 not going to have any fixes after 3.2.2, +</I>><i> although 3.4 will still not be ready at that time, leaving users with several +</I>><i> months without any fixes ? I would understand that 3.2 would stop being +</I>><i> supported a few months after 3.4 is out, but if really support stops *before*, +</I>><i> that's puzzling :) +</I> +Nothing new, has been like this for various releases. We did use to do a +.3 release, but it takes quite a lot of time to do that, and we didn't +see the benefit. No distro also complained to GNOME for the lack of a .3 +release. + +Note that it only relates to whole of GNOME, if a maintainer wants to +make another release, they're free to do so. Most do not though, but +some do. + +><i> For small projects, I can understand that developers always want to you to use +</I>><i> the latest (lastest stable version at least), but for bigger projects such as +</I>><i> a DE, I would find it surprising. We all know that once a major version has +</I>><i> been released, it will have users for years. +</I> +I think you're getting the intention wrong. GNOME 3.2 is a bugfix for +3.0; 3.4 is a bugfix for 3.2. If distributions want to rely on an older +version, that is nice, but as it is their choice. + +><i> When users report a bug in Mageia 1, we don't tell them "use cauldron, it's +</I>><i> fixed them": we try to fix it in Mageia 1. +</I> +GNOME is not a distribution. We cannot get any fix to the user. Always +up to the distro. So as we cannot provide such a service anyway, a +distribution has to do it. And they do sometimes cherrypick commits. +-- +Regards, +Olav +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008568.html">[Mageia-dev] pm-utils and requires to bootloader-utils +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008577.html">[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2? +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#8571">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#8571">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#8571">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#8571">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |