summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008563.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008563.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008563.html108
1 files changed, 108 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008563.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008563.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..16a64334c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/008563.html
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri)
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Opening%20backports%20%28was%20Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20Using%0A%09SQL%20database%20for%20youri%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201110010114.15337.stormi%40laposte.net%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="008561.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="008572.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri)</H1>
+ <B>Samuel Verschelde</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Opening%20backports%20%28was%20Re%3A%20%5BMageia-sysadm%5D%20Using%0A%09SQL%20database%20for%20youri%29&In-Reply-To=%3C201110010114.15337.stormi%40laposte.net%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri)">stormi at laposte.net
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Sat Oct 1 01:14:15 CEST 2011</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008561.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri)
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008572.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#8563">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#8563">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#8563">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#8563">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>Le samedi 1 octobre 2011 00:57:35, blind Pete a &#233;crit :
+&gt;<i> on Sat, 1 Oct 2011 08:05
+</I>&gt;<i> in the Usenet newsgroup gmane.linux.mageia.devel
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Maarten Vanraes wrote:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; Op vrijdag 30 september 2011 23:35:40 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; Le jeudi 29 septembre 2011 21:10:42, Samuel Verschelde a &#233;crit :
+</I>&gt;<i> [snip]
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; Also, the sooner we have backports, the less there will be external
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; third- party repos with all the problems (upgrade, support) that
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; causes. There already are, don't let them too much space and rather
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; invite their packagers to backport *inside* (as long as they stay
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; &gt; within the policy of course).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> [snip]
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; If needed, the tremendous amount of packages in Blogdrake's 3rd party
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; media shows how much backports are needed by users, whatever we as
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; packagers can think of it.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; I'm still convinced that opening backports right now, using one of my 2
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; proposals (if I haven't overlooked a technical difficulty), would be an
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; important step forward for us.
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; Best regards
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;&gt; Samuel
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt;
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; I have to agree, if opening backports brings in more packagers who are
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; likely to integrate well AND bring in more users AND likely would step
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; up and maintain similar packages, we should help their effort and not
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; get our community too splintered, even though updates _is_ more
+</I>&gt;<i> &gt; important than backports.
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Potentially silly idea:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> Would it be worth having backports-supported and backports-unsupported,
+</I>&gt;<i> or backports and backports-untested, or backports and backports-3rd-party?
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> You could occasionally move things in either direction between
+</I>&gt;<i> supported and unsupported.
+</I>
+You already have them: backports and backports_testing. backports is
+supported, backports_testing isn't (equivalent to your backports-untested).
+However, packages sent to backports_testing must respect the backports policy,
+which is a difference with 3rd party media where we don't know what policy is
+applied.
+
+Best regards
+
+Samuel Verschelde
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="008561.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri)
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="008572.html">[Mageia-dev] Opening backports (was Re: [Mageia-sysadm] Using SQL database for youri)
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#8563">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#8563">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#8563">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#8563">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>