diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005580.html')
| -rw-r--r-- | zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005580.html | 183 |
1 files changed, 183 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005580.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005580.html new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5b6106064 --- /dev/null +++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005580.html @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN"> +<HTML> + <HEAD> + <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion + </TITLE> + <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" > + <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C4DF70CEA.2040502%40gmx.de%3E"> + <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow"> + <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"> + <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="005579.html"> + <LINK REL="Next" HREF="005648.html"> + </HEAD> + <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"> + <H1>[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion</H1> + <B>Thorsten van Lil</B> + <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Release%20cycles%20proposals%2C%20and%20discussion&In-Reply-To=%3C4DF70CEA.2040502%40gmx.de%3E" + TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion">tvl83 at gmx.de + </A><BR> + <I>Tue Jun 14 09:25:30 CEST 2011</I> + <P><UL> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005579.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005648.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#5580">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#5580">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#5580">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#5580">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + <HR> +<!--beginarticle--> +<PRE>Am 14.06.2011 08:48, schrieb Oliver Burger: +><i> Thorsten van Lil <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">tvl83 at gmx.de</A>> schrieb am 14.06.2011 +</I>><i> > An Upgrade is nearly the same, than reinstalling. The difference is +</I>><i> > only, that you can use your system in the mean time and you are +</I>><i> > not forced to install the missing packages. +</I>><i> +</I>><i> And you keep all your precious settings and databases and webroots and... +</I>><i> +</I>><i> And of couse the software you did unstall outside of the package +</I>><i> management (proprietary stuff,...). +</I>><i> +</I>><i> +</I>><i> And a bit to the argument of having to install loads of software at the +</I>><i> same time: When some basic libraries are upgraded, loads of software +</I>><i> have to be rebuilt against them, so with the rolling aproach you will +</I>><i> just get that massive upgrades more often, so where is the bonus in it? +</I> +For sure. No matter what release model you want to take, if you want an +up to date system, you have to update (if this is your counter +argument). But it's a different if I have to update everything (~3GB) at +once or if I have to update ~100MB in a week. And it's a difference if I +have to wait for the software 1/2 year or just a month (if I only want +to use official supported repos). + +><i> If people want to have their software more up to date, use backports +</I> +Backports aren't supposed to be for the averaged user and shouldn't be +used to bring the half of your system up to date. We could rework the +backports and than officially support them (wouldn't this solve also the +issue with new packages in mga1?). But than we have almost 2 different +release models. I'm not sure this is what we want. + +Well, Oliver. You are a packager. I'm not. Our menpower is the +restriction in the whole discussion. If it isn't, we could provide every +thoughtable release model and cycle and everyone would be happy. But +that's not the case. So, if a proposal is unworkably please tell us, as +well as your other concerns. + +In my first post I tried to summarize all advantages and disadvantages +of the different release models. Did I miss a point, than please add it. +And I'm also fine with a static release model, but I think such a light +rolling can have a lot of advantages. + +Thorsten +</PRE> + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +<!--endarticle--> + <HR> + <P><UL> + <!--threads--> + <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005579.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005648.html">[Mageia-dev] Release cycles proposals, and discussion +</A></li> + <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> + <a href="date.html#5580">[ date ]</a> + <a href="thread.html#5580">[ thread ]</a> + <a href="subject.html#5580">[ subject ]</a> + <a href="author.html#5580">[ author ]</a> + </LI> + </UL> + +<hr> +<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev +mailing list</a><br> +</body></html> |