summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001692.html
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001692.html')
-rw-r--r--zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001692.html149
1 files changed, 149 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001692.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001692.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..779504e50
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101210/001692.html
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
+<HTML>
+ <HEAD>
+ <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
+ </TITLE>
+ <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
+ <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTi%3DU3%3DAxYJG9AMisYjZW%2BjRZspjFqGR1V2_VkF_C%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
+ <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
+ <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
+ <LINK REL="Previous" HREF="001691.html">
+ <LINK REL="Next" HREF="001693.html">
+ </HEAD>
+ <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
+ <H1>[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout</H1>
+ <B>Romain d'Alverny</B>
+ <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Mirror%20layout&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTi%3DU3%3DAxYJG9AMisYjZW%2BjRZspjFqGR1V2_VkF_C%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
+ TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout">rdalverny at gmail.com
+ </A><BR>
+ <I>Fri Dec 10 19:37:38 CET 2010</I>
+ <P><UL>
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001691.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001693.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1692">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1692">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1692">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1692">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+ <HR>
+<!--beginarticle-->
+<PRE>On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 19:14, Wolfgang Bornath &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">molch.b at googlemail.com</A>&gt; wrote:
+&gt;<i> 2010/12/10 Romain d'Alverny &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">rdalverny at gmail.com</A>&gt;:
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Ok, but you still take into account SP in your answer. :-p (we would
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> have come to that, but the idea was to think about it from a na&#239;ve,
+</I>&gt;&gt;<i> software-patent-free perspective).
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> If there were no software patents anywhere what would be the issue of
+</I>&gt;<i> this discussion?
+</I>&gt;<i> IMHO it makes no sense to discuss something which does not exist
+</I>
+It does. Because it helps looking at a problem from a totally
+different perspective, build from that, and see the
+missing/conflicting pieces when you look back at the full problem (or
+as you used to look at it before). Which conflicting/missing pieces
+may not be the ones one thought they were.
+
+&gt;<i> I see the strategy in your proposition but:
+</I>&gt;<i>
+</I>&gt;<i> 1. We know from the start that there ARE packages with software which
+</I>&gt;<i> is patented in some countries. So, the &quot;let's start empty and see what
+</I>&gt;<i> comes up&quot; is already done with.
+</I>
+Are there issues with it? (looking at my previous check-list, maybe to
+improve). If so, yes, let's fill this up. If not, let's leave it alone
+in the core.
+
+I mean, what difference does it make with PLF repositories that are
+already mirrored? what differences does it make with Debian stuff that
+is already mirrored? do they get cease &amp; desist? do we hear about
+this?
+
+&gt;<i> 2. In some countries mirror maintainers can not wait until somebody
+</I>&gt;<i> raises his hand, there are lawyers who write nice &quot;cease and desist&quot;
+</I>&gt;<i> letters, attached is a bill you have to pay. In Germany this is called
+</I>&gt;<i> &quot;Kostenpflichtige Abmahnung&quot; &#160;and has grown to a habit of some
+</I>&gt;<i> lawyers.
+</I>
+Then in these cases, two options:
+ - just do not mirror; and people use mirrors on the borders;
+ - Mageia (or some related entity) provides legal services about this
+(taking responsibility for the hosting or other).
+
+Why &quot;just do not mirror&quot;? Because, taking the strict statu-quo point
+of view regarding the software patent thing, that is &quot;just follow the
+most restrictive set of rules&quot;, we won't be able to cope with just
+medias to separate patented software from non-patented sw. It will be
+a matter of tags, because the situation is different from territory to
+territory. And there are more than two for that matter.
+
+&gt;<i> Meaning: you can't wait and see what happens, you have to make sure
+</I>&gt;<i> that it does not happen from the start.
+</I>
+We can't be sure at all of anything. That's why that's to take a
+risk-management attitude, provided what we want to achieve, what
+stance we want to take.
+
+&gt;<i> I mean, opinions about software patents set aside for a minute,
+</I>&gt;<i> software patents are protected by official law in those countries. You
+</I>&gt;<i> can not break the law on the basis of &quot;let's see what happens&quot;.
+</I>
+Many do. Not only for software, but for everything. For many reasons,
+among which can be: the law is broken, the law is becoming obsolete,
+people do not enforce it, the law should be changed, etc.
+
+Well, actually, there are two options: break the law/try it as it is.
+Or follow it strictly to demonstrate its absurdity. What I propose
+here is a middle-ground some other projects already take.
+
+With the reasonable attitude to manage cases that _are precisely
+identified_ (so we avoid reports such as &quot;this piece of software is
+likely to be patented&quot;; point needed is: is it? or not? how, why, by
+who, is it valid, is it free, is it enforced, are we noticeable/a
+target, does it matter given our size?
+
+As said before, regarding law on software patents, the situation today
+is, that's a battlefield anyway. Although the situation in EU should
+be clear (no SP), it's not (as many other things at the moment too,
+sadly).
+
+That's a proposal. It has shortcomings too of course; what I find
+interesting in this is that:
+ - it makes Mageia put a few steps into the software patents debate
+(instead of only trying to cope with an inconsistent, unpracticable
+set of rules that we mostly even don't find legitimate at the very
+start);
+ - it may reveal to be less of a burden than we currently think; it
+may be worse; either case, we can adapt from a situation we will have
+_experienced_.
+
+Now, that's nothing more than a proposal. :-p
+
+Romain
+</PRE>
+
+
+<!--endarticle-->
+ <HR>
+ <P><UL>
+ <!--threads-->
+ <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001691.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
+</A></li>
+ <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001693.html">[Mageia-dev] Mirror layout
+</A></li>
+ <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
+ <a href="date.html#1692">[ date ]</a>
+ <a href="thread.html#1692">[ thread ]</a>
+ <a href="subject.html#1692">[ subject ]</a>
+ <a href="author.html#1692">[ author ]</a>
+ </LI>
+ </UL>
+
+<hr>
+<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
+mailing list</a><br>
+</body></html>