Add zarb MLs html archivesHEADmaster

2 files changed, 104 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101007/145d9585/attachment-0001.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101007/145d9585/attachment-0001.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..03b3b4ed3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101007/145d9585/attachment-0001.html
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:07 PM, andré <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:andr55@laposte.net">andr55@laposte.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+Sander Lepik a écrit :<div class="im"><br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+  02.10.2010 18:22, Remco Rijnders kirjutas:<br>
+   <br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 03:13:27PM +0000, André Machado wrote:<br>
+<br>
+* Mageia 2011.0 ?<br>
+* Mageia 2001.1 ?<br>
+* Mageia 11.01 ? :D<br>
+* Mageia 1.0 ?<br>
+     <br>
+</blockquote>
+20xx.0 -&gt;  20xx.1 is perfect. Tho&#39; 20xx.0 should be released at spring time and 20xx.1 later<br>
+the same year. At the moment it doesn&#39;t make sense and many friends have asked why is 20xy<br>
+released in 20x(y-1).<br>
+   <br>
+</blockquote></div>
+Exactly.  Mandriva version numbering sounds like we are selling cars.  (You know, all image and no substance.)<br>
+So let&#39;s go for Mageia 2010.1 if we can do it this fall.  (Hopefully)<br>
+And Mageia 2011.0 in the spring.<br>
+Note that we will have to recompile to change Mandriva to Mageia, so changing the version number should cause no problem.<div class="im"><br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+
+How about instead of using 0 or 1, use the month number instead? So, .3<br>
+for a release made in March. That way we are always &quot;up to date&quot; and can<br>
+allow for release schedules slipping or having a 3rd release within a year<br>
+if needed / fitting.<br>
+     <br>
+</blockquote>
+Such versioning is bad. It forces you into time limit like it is with Ubuntu. And i don&#39;t<br>
+like it. When the release needs to be delayed it&#39;s better to do so. Not to push it out and<br>
+then land loads of fixes on it like has happened to Ubuntu. Also you don&#39;t have to remember<br>
+which month it was released in year 2008. Was it 2008.3 or 2008.5?<br>
+   <br>
+</blockquote></div>
+It is a lot simpler to use 0 or 1.<br>
+If the month is used, and there is a delay for some reason, would you want to have to change the names of 100&#39;s of files ?<br>
+Including the dependancies in the RPM&#39;s ?<br>
+Otherwise, the month would have no more meaning than 0 or 1.<br>
+<br>
+And why would you want 3 releases in a year ?  With the pace of changes in Linux, 2 seems just right.  If there are any important updates, for security, for instance, that is already built into the Mandriva system we are inheriting (like virtually all others).<br>
+
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+--<br>
+Sander<br>
+   <br>
+</blockquote>
+- André (andre999)<br>
+<br>
+</blockquote></div>Why not make them read the version info from one place? (on a long term...)<br>
diff --git a/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101007/145d9585/attachment.html b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101007/145d9585/attachment.html
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..03b3b4ed3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/attachments/20101007/145d9585/attachment.html
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:07 PM, andré <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:andr55@laposte.net">andr55@laposte.net</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+Sander Lepik a écrit :<div class="im"><br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+  02.10.2010 18:22, Remco Rijnders kirjutas:<br>
+   <br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 03:13:27PM +0000, André Machado wrote:<br>
+<br>
+* Mageia 2011.0 ?<br>
+* Mageia 2001.1 ?<br>
+* Mageia 11.01 ? :D<br>
+* Mageia 1.0 ?<br>
+     <br>
+</blockquote>
+20xx.0 -&gt;  20xx.1 is perfect. Tho&#39; 20xx.0 should be released at spring time and 20xx.1 later<br>
+the same year. At the moment it doesn&#39;t make sense and many friends have asked why is 20xy<br>
+released in 20x(y-1).<br>
+   <br>
+</blockquote></div>
+Exactly.  Mandriva version numbering sounds like we are selling cars.  (You know, all image and no substance.)<br>
+So let&#39;s go for Mageia 2010.1 if we can do it this fall.  (Hopefully)<br>
+And Mageia 2011.0 in the spring.<br>
+Note that we will have to recompile to change Mandriva to Mageia, so changing the version number should cause no problem.<div class="im"><br>
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+
+How about instead of using 0 or 1, use the month number instead? So, .3<br>
+for a release made in March. That way we are always &quot;up to date&quot; and can<br>
+allow for release schedules slipping or having a 3rd release within a year<br>
+if needed / fitting.<br>
+     <br>
+</blockquote>
+Such versioning is bad. It forces you into time limit like it is with Ubuntu. And i don&#39;t<br>
+like it. When the release needs to be delayed it&#39;s better to do so. Not to push it out and<br>
+then land loads of fixes on it like has happened to Ubuntu. Also you don&#39;t have to remember<br>
+which month it was released in year 2008. Was it 2008.3 or 2008.5?<br>
+   <br>
+</blockquote></div>
+It is a lot simpler to use 0 or 1.<br>
+If the month is used, and there is a delay for some reason, would you want to have to change the names of 100&#39;s of files ?<br>
+Including the dependancies in the RPM&#39;s ?<br>
+Otherwise, the month would have no more meaning than 0 or 1.<br>
+<br>
+And why would you want 3 releases in a year ?  With the pace of changes in Linux, 2 seems just right.  If there are any important updates, for security, for instance, that is already built into the Mandriva system we are inheriting (like virtually all others).<br>
+
+<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
+--<br>
+Sander<br>
+   <br>
+</blockquote>
+- André (andre999)<br>
+<br>
+</blockquote></div>Why not make them read the version info from one place? (on a long term...)<br>