1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/docs/installer/en/choosePackages.xml b/docs/installer/en/choosePackages.xml
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..609244e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/docs/installer/en/choosePackages.xml
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><section xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" xmlns:ns5="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:ns42="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:ns4="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ns3="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:ns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" version="5.0" xml:id="choosePackages">
+
+  <info>
+    <title xml:id="choosePackages-ti1">Choosing Packages to be
+    Installed</title>
+  </info>
+
+  <!-- Started by marja on 2012 03 29 -->
+
+  <!-- Still NEEDS TO BE FINISHED AND THEN REVIEWED! -->
+
+  <!-- SimonNZG 2012-04-03 has taken a look but needs to come back-->
+
+  <!-- barjac 2012-04-12 has done some work on this - removed ADD TEXT notes just 
+       in case this is not done in time ;)-->
+
+  <!-- marja 2012-04-14 moved </para> tag that was to far down and included other
+       paragraphs up to the paragraph it should close-->
+
+  <!-- barjac 2012-04-14 minor edits and removed  "revision=1" from 1st para -->
+
+  <!-- marja 2012-05-08 added kbulgrien's line about the slide show -->
+  <!-- marja 2012-05-14 after discussion with JohnR and MrsB changed "either" back 
+       to "neither" in the Desktop Selection section -->
+<!--marja 2012-12-26 exported chooseDesktop, choosePackageGroups, minimal-install and choosePackagesTree to separate files -->
+<!--marja 2012-12-26 moved what was left of this page to chooseDesktop, because there doesn't seem to be a help button linking to this page -->
+<!-- marja 2013-01-03 Remove this page from DrakX.xml, but keep it in Calenco because it is part of the history for the 4 above mentioned files. -->
+
+  <para xml:id="choosePackages-pa1">This file is choosePackages.html.</para>
+  <para>This page was split into 4 new pages. We must keep it in Calenco for the history, but it shouldn't be used in a publication anymore.</para>
+
+</section>