blob: 067fc7e3bdd8ac72e6460eece4edb791683710d5 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Habemus%20logo&In-Reply-To=%3C4D037DE6.8090504%40laposte.net%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="003222.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="003226.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo</H1>
<B>andre999</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Habemus%20logo&In-Reply-To=%3C4D037DE6.8090504%40laposte.net%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo">andr55 at laposte.net
</A><BR>
<I>Sat Dec 11 14:34:30 CET 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003222.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="003226.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#3225">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#3225">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#3225">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#3225">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
><i>
</I>><i> I want to point to skiper's blog, who gave the whole "Logo" issue some
</I>><i> thought. It is titled, "Mageia logo - I don't like it".
</I>><i>
</I>><i> But what he writes is very different from the usual "I don't like it,
</I>><i> it's ugly" posts. I explains in detail why he does not like it and why
</I>><i> he thinks it is not a good choice based on objective reasons. Although
</I>><i> I do not share his opinion I want to give credit to him because he did
</I>><i> not just complain, he put some thinking and time into explaining his
</I>><i> opinion.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> BTW: He explicitely states that he does not complain about the
</I>><i> decision finding process.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> <A HREF="http://skiperdrake.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/mageia-logo-i-am-not-happy-with-it/">http://skiperdrake.wordpress.com/2010/12/11/mageia-logo-i-am-not-happy-with-it/</A>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Good reading, even if it is not my opinion :)
</I>
Interesting that he makes exactly the same criticism that I made during
the selection process : the logo is too simple.
Anyway, it is done.
( But his criticism did make me think that we could turn it into a nest,
with a colourful simply drawn bird in it. But I'm getting carried away
... again )
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="003222.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="003226.html">[Mageia-discuss] Habemus logo
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#3225">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#3225">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#3225">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#3225">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
