blob: 9cd0cbc2078c7775524ae43fc46dd388da28ba50 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions&In-Reply-To=%3C1288024675.4401.15.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002641.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="002648.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions</H1>
<B>Michael Scherer</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Suggestions&In-Reply-To=%3C1288024675.4401.15.camel%40akroma.ephaone.org%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions">misc at zarb.org
</A><BR>
<I>Mon Oct 25 18:37:55 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002641.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002648.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2642">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2642">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2642">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2642">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 18:24 +0200, Wolfgang Bornath a écrit :
><i> 2010/10/25 Michael Scherer <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">misc at zarb.org</A>>:
</I>><i> > Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 11:37 -0400, andre999 a écrit :
</I>><i> >>
</I>><i> >> Exactly. I'm getting more and more the sense that there should be a
</I>><i> >> separate bugzilla section for documentation, which would include
</I>><i> >> packaging descriptions.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Ie, a separate section ?
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > What would it achieve that the current bugzilla system would not ?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> I don't think it would help. There is (was) the tag "Doc" (or similar)
</I>><i> in Bugzilla which already marked the bug as something related to
</I>><i> documentation. Somebody who is concerned and ignored that would also
</I>><i> ignore a separate section and vice versa.
</I>><i> I like a more general approach involving the users and packagers likewise:
</I>><i> - see a lack of or bad description in the "Individual package
</I>><i> selection and/or rpmdrake
</I>><i> - report it as a bug, giving the necessary explanation (in an ideal
</I>><i> world offer a good description yourself)
</I>><i> - triage team dedicates the bug to either the packager or the
</I>><i> developper who inserts the description in the installer.
</I>
I would even add a tag on it, for junior job, or something like that. Ie
small changes that can be done by newer packagers, just to learn how to
change a package without requiring specific technical skills.
--
Michael Scherer
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002641.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002648.html">[Mageia-discuss] Suggestions
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2642">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2642">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2642">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2642">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
