summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20101012/002349.html
blob: 132e8ad8338cd3db827790b9b98c88b3db0bb2b6 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] How about launching &quot;Mageia working parties&quot;?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20How%20about%20launching%20%22Mageia%20working%20parties%22%3F&In-Reply-To=%3Ci91agk%24okl%242%40dough.gmane.org%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="002348.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="002350.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-discuss] How about launching &quot;Mageia working parties&quot;?</H1>
    <B>Marc Par&#233;</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20How%20about%20launching%20%22Mageia%20working%20parties%22%3F&In-Reply-To=%3Ci91agk%24okl%242%40dough.gmane.org%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] How about launching &quot;Mageia working parties&quot;?">marc at marcpare.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Tue Oct 12 11:41:40 CEST 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002348.html">[Mageia-discuss] How about launching &quot;Mageia working parties&quot;?
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="002350.html">[Mageia-discuss] How about launching &quot;Mageia working parties&quot;?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#2349">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#2349">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#2349">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#2349">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le 2010-10-12 04:54, Romain d'Alverny a &#233;crit :
&gt;<i> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 10:17, Juergen Harms&lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">Juergen.Harms at unige.ch</A>&gt;  wrote:
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> [...]
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> That's an excellent point that indeed, complements teams, for
</I>&gt;<i> cross-displinary works and experiments.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> Some embroidery around how such working parties might work:
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - their principal aim should be to work out concepts / proposals that
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> improve the end-user value of Mageia;
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - their work should be complementary to what the established Mageia
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> structures do (Mageia teams, the cooker-follow-up, etc);
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - they should be self-organised (off-load work from the established
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> structures; in one extreme using a private mailing list for communication,
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> in the other extreme use a temporarily maintained sub-forum)
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> - they should work under the umbrella of Mageia (the work should in relation
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> to topics raised in Mageia mailing lists and forums, Mageia should be kept
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> informed; Mageia might formulate some general guidelines to be respected in
</I>&gt;&gt;<i> order to accept the working party under the label of Mageia).
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> So that would be coordinated by/reported to the Mageia Council then.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> There needs to be some sort of formal designation (to know who is
</I>&gt;<i> working with whom and on what) as well as progress/final reporting and
</I>&gt;<i> archives of discussions or results. But that's something to iron out
</I>&gt;<i> of practice.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> Would be good/obvious for Mageia.org to provide tools for that, but
</I>&gt;<i> indeed, letting these groups experiment with unused, outside tools is
</I>&gt;<i> a good opportunity as well.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> As for the &quot;Install from Windows&quot; thing, that could be a start, but
</I>&gt;<i> (these are general points anyway):
</I>&gt;<i>   - before, or while building this work group, you have to assess the
</I>&gt;<i> value of having an Linux installer from Windows; that is, goal is not
</I>&gt;<i> to make a &quot;me too&quot; installer; goal is to understand why/if there needs
</I>&gt;<i> to be a Linux installer from Windows in the first place and if there
</I>&gt;<i> is a user-benefit of having one on the large scale and in the user
</I>&gt;<i> flow (that is, as several pointed out in the thread, isn't this more
</I>&gt;<i> like a &quot;fast&quot; answer to a problem that has not been thought deeply
</I>&gt;<i> enough?) =&gt;  in short, what problem does this solve? is it really the
</I>&gt;<i> problem? is it really a good solution?
</I>&gt;<i>   - for instance, is it to fully replace the system? dual boot? user to
</I>&gt;<i> decide? will the user be properly reassured about the process, her
</I>&gt;<i> data and really understand what is going to happen?
</I>&gt;<i>   - note that this is not to discourage, it's to test the idea;
</I>&gt;<i> moreover, there can be other benefits from working on a Windows-based
</I>&gt;<i> Linux installer (if ever): knowledge, inter-systems operatins, doc,
</I>&gt;<i> skills;
</I>&gt;<i>   - volunteers should spec this (a short one will do), what they expect
</I>&gt;<i> to demonstrate as a proof-of-concept (working program, user flow
</I>&gt;<i> project), build the work group (for instance here, will likely need a
</I>&gt;<i> Windows system developer at least), focus and then go ahead.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> Romain
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>
Just in case you are not aware, there is a survey on the discuss list 
trying to collect this particular data. You may want to add your input 
to the survey. Look for the thread: &quot;[tdf-discuss] Survey|Opinion - 
LibreOffice Install and Update&quot; where some users have already raised 
these points.

Marc

</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002348.html">[Mageia-discuss] How about launching &quot;Mageia working parties&quot;?
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002350.html">[Mageia-discuss] How about launching &quot;Mageia working parties&quot;?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#2349">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#2349">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#2349">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#2349">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>