blob: ff64fab50521db99f599844dfbcdcdb4099a2dd2 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mageia%20governance%20model%20draft&In-Reply-To=%3C265.4cab5c79%40mageia.linuxtech.net%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002224.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="002226.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft</H1>
<B>Tux99</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Mageia%20governance%20model%20draft&In-Reply-To=%3C265.4cab5c79%40mageia.linuxtech.net%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft">tux99-mga at uridium.org
</A><BR>
<I>Tue Oct 5 19:12:28 CEST 2010</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002224.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002226.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2225">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2225">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2225">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2225">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>
Quote: Michael Scherer wrote on Tue, 05 October 2010 18:55
><i>
</I>><i> As I said on irc, I kinda dislike calling a group "master" for
</I>><i> packagers. We are trying to reduce the gap between developers and
</I>><i> users,
</I>><i> and as a developer, I am really bothered by such appellation because I
</I>><i> feel it put too much distance between me and non developers, and I
</I>><i> think
</I>><i> we try to avoid that.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> More ever, some people think "I am not in the master group, this name
</I>><i> sound made for important people so I cannot do anything", and do not
</I>><i> feel empowered.
</I>
I agree an the bad choice of the word master is probably what triggered my
earlier negative reply.
Why not just use:
packager (for everyone who is experienced/trained)
mentor packager (for those mentoring apprentices)
apprentice packager (for those still being trained by the mentors)
There is no need to give an experienced packager a pompous title.
In FOSS what counts is the work done, not the title.
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002224.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002226.html">[Mageia-discuss] Mageia governance model draft
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2225">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2225">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2225">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2225">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
