summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-discuss/20100924/000976.html
blob: f5ac87dd2d69cdbd83d03ba8e17eaf2bd75ab79c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Think about bugzilla monitoring?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Think%20about%20bugzilla%20monitoring%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTi%3D5a_Mfn3JrHaCnCWM938VxrYbNUshQ4cz5SezA%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="000975.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="000977.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-discuss] Think about bugzilla monitoring?</H1>
    <B>Frederic Janssens</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Think%20about%20bugzilla%20monitoring%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CAANLkTi%3D5a_Mfn3JrHaCnCWM938VxrYbNUshQ4cz5SezA%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Think about bugzilla monitoring?">fjanss at gmail.com
       </A><BR>
    <I>Fri Sep 24 14:07:29 CEST 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000975.html">[Mageia-discuss] Think about bugzilla monitoring?
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="000977.html">[Mageia-discuss] Think about bugzilla monitoring?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#976">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#976">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#976">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#976">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 13:58, Juergen Harms &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">Juergen.Harms at unige.ch</A>&gt; wrote:

&gt;<i> Picking up from where Mageia forked off, many things activities look like
</I>&gt;<i> continuity from Mandriva Linux. But forking is also a challenge to find not
</I>&gt;<i> too hard to implement improvements - such as &quot;bugzilla monitoring&quot;.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> I think I am not the only one who frequently felt frustrated submitting yet
</I>&gt;<i> another bug, knowing that it had more 50% of chance to disappear the
</I>&gt;<i> &quot;oubliettes&quot;. I think there is an objective question: if bugs are not
</I>&gt;<i> followed up, that should not just happen by accident - there should be an
</I>&gt;<i> explicit and justified decision. There is also a subjective question: a user
</I>&gt;<i> who went through the pains to write a good bug report should get a feedback
</I>&gt;<i> with a followup, even if there are no &quot;comments&quot; in the bugzilla data base.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> Some ideas: have a &quot;lost bug advocate&quot;? create a team - just like the
</I>&gt;<i> &quot;triage team&quot; that feels responsible for bugs not to disappear? (different
</I>&gt;<i> from the, but talking to, maybe overlapping the triage team, leaning on the
</I>&gt;<i> &quot;dev&quot; - in Mageia it will be a volonteer, even more important - to whom a
</I>&gt;<i> bug is assigned) - proposing and justifying which bugs - for the time being
</I>&gt;<i> - will have no follow up), creating some commented statistics on the fate of
</I>&gt;<i> bugs - good for QA, but also for PR about Mageia? trigger an alarm if too
</I>&gt;<i> many bugs remain un-resolved? - always assuming that enough active
</I>&gt;<i> contribution can be recruited from the temp. wiki list. I also believe that,
</I>&gt;<i> for Mageia, the situation is different. In Mandriva, I guess that some
</I>&gt;<i> (many?) of these acitivities were done by staff of the QA group - in Mageia
</I>&gt;<i> an alternative is needed.
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>&gt;<i> Maybe Mandriva had something like this - if yes, it was too well hidden.
</I>&gt;<i> _______________________________________________
</I>&gt;<i> Mageia-discuss mailing list
</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">Mageia-discuss at mageia.org</A>
</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss</A>
</I>&gt;<i>
</I>
+1

-- 

Frederic
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: &lt;/pipermail/mageia-discuss/attachments/20100924/125c2520/attachment.html&gt;
</PRE>


































<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="000975.html">[Mageia-discuss] Think about bugzilla monitoring?
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="000977.html">[Mageia-discuss] Think about bugzilla monitoring?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#976">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#976">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#976">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#976">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>