blob: 439283f9fdfce57f60c608faa0cebf088207e070 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
|
<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 05:33, D.Morgan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dmorganec@gmail.com">dmorganec@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Eugeni Dodonov <<a href="mailto:eugeni@dodonov.net">eugeni@dodonov.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
><br>
> just wondering, is the switch from util-linux-ng 2.18 to util-linux 2.19+<br>
> planned?<br>
<br>
</div>not yet because nobody proposed or had time, but if you want this is<br>
i think the perfect time<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Cool, I can help with that!<br><br>What would be the best solution - import a new util-linux package, with Obsoletes/Provides for util-linux-ng; or rename util-linux-ng in svn to util-linux and update the spec?<br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>Eugeni Dodonov<br><a href="http://eugeni.dodonov.net/" target="_blank">http://eugeni.dodonov.net/</a><br>
|
