blob: a9b557ffc86e3c6e0a0f4834db903f54bbddffb1 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
|
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/10/1 atilla ontas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:tarakbumba@gmail.com">tarakbumba@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I'm just wondering if we follow Mandriva's release cycle model. Every<br>
6th months a release or one year and one release. I think we should<br>
make one release in one year. By doing so devs and translators won't<br>
be in rush in every 6 months. Also there are major changes like<br>
systemd/upstart; those system related things will be more mature in a<br>
year to use. It makes the distro more stable and decraese mirrors<br>
space waste.<br>
<br>
One more thing. Do we follow Mandriva's release naming scheme? I.e. do<br>
we call our first release 2011.x ? I don't like this naming scheme and<br>
suggesting using number of release as naming like Mageia 1.0 or using<br>
code names.<br>
<br>
What's your opinion?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Hi all.</div><div><br></div><div>At this time, there is a survey asking to the blogdrake's community what kind of release cycle they prefer. This survey will be active until the weekend and I think this could be an acceptable look about community preferences.</div>
<div><br></div><div>We must keep on mind we're creating a user-oriented distro, so we must be stay in touch about their preferences.</div><div><br></div><div>Cheers</div></div><br>
|
