1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Compatibility%3A%20%25mdkversion%20macro%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201101160915.27646.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="002178.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="002180.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?</H1>
<B>Maarten Vanraes</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Compatibility%3A%20%25mdkversion%20macro%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C201101160915.27646.maarten.vanraes%40gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?">maarten.vanraes at gmail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sun Jan 16 09:15:27 CET 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002178.html">[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002180.html">[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2179">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2179">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2179">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2179">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Op zondag 16 januari 2011 01:19:29 schreef Samuel Verschelde:
><i> Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 00:07:56, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
</I>><i> > Hi all!
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to
</I>><i> > 201100 for the time being, or should we not have one at all?
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Not having it will cause any src.rpms that have any
</I>><i> > "%if %mdkversion < x" to fail to build.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > I'm strongly in favor of having it for compatibility reasons, so that
</I>><i> > most MDV src.rpms keep building on Mageia for the time being, including
</I>><i> > those provided by any 3rd party packagers.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > Not having the macro will cause us to lose that compatibility for very
</I>><i> > little benefit, IMO. It could maybe be removed after several releases,
</I>><i> > but not before.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > However, it seems blino disagreed with this, and he thinks we should not
</I>><i> > have these macros at all.
</I>><i> >
</I>><i> > What do other people think?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> If not having those macros means we can't compile mdv SRPMS on mageia, then
</I>><i> I'd prefer we keep it.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Regards
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Samuel Verschelde
</I>
i would prefer to have some kind of %{_vendor}%{_vendor_release} type of
thing, we could easily have mandriva and mageia use the same tags for this.
after all, there will be a time where we will need similar compatibility. and
it's be easier for later to possibly have similar .spec files with other
vendors: PLF? OpenSuse, Fedora, ...
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="002178.html">[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="002180.html">[Mageia-dev] Compatibility: %mdkversion macro?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#2179">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#2179">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#2179">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#2179">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|
