zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-October/009234.html


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Updating%20ruby%20to%201.9.3%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1320059356.2218.2.camel%40localhost%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="009232.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="009237.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?</H1>
    <B>Michael Scherer</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Updating%20ruby%20to%201.9.3%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C1320059356.2218.2.camel%40localhost%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?">misc at zarb.org
       </A><BR>
    <I>Mon Oct 31 12:09:16 CET 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009232.html">[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="009237.html">[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#9234">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#9234">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#9234">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#9234">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 &#224; 14:12 +0800, Funda Wang a &#233;crit :
&gt;<i> Hello,
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> After reading this:
</I>&gt;<i> <A HREF="http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/10/06/plans-for-1-8-7">http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/10/06/plans-for-1-8-7</A>
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> We will support mageia 2 for 18 months (May 2012 to Nov 2013). But
</I>&gt;<i> upstream will end ruby 1.8.7 at the time of June 2013. That means, we
</I>&gt;<i> won't have any support from upstream even for security issues from
</I>&gt;<i> June 2013 to Nov 2013. Of course, if mageia 2 be delayed....
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> Should we update ruby into 1.9 so that we still have support from upstream?
</I>
Afaik, ruby 1.9 use a slightly different syntax than ruby 1.8 ( and of
course, that's slightly incompatible, which translate usually to
slightly lots of issues ).

I know that puppet just fixed some issue regarding ruby 1.9. I am not
sure the rest of the crowd is following.

-- 
Michael Scherer

</PRE>


<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="009232.html">[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="009237.html">[Mageia-dev] Updating ruby to 1.9.3?
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#9234">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#9234">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#9234">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#9234">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>