summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/2011-June/005472.html
blob: 6dd89f3cc2b4a6ab8f528e79185a33473032b6a0 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Question%20about%20backports%3A%20calibre%20%28bug%201659%29&In-Reply-To=%3C991131.90388.qm%40web161705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="005476.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="005485.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)</H1>
    <B>Radu-Cristian FOTESCU</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Question%20about%20backports%3A%20calibre%20%28bug%201659%29&In-Reply-To=%3C991131.90388.qm%40web161705.mail.bf1.yahoo.com%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)">beranger5ca at yahoo.ca
       </A><BR>
    <I>Mon Jun 13 11:51:18 CEST 2011</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005476.html">[Mageia-dev] Some news regarding rpm packaging rules : %clean	section
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="005485.html">[Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#5472">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#5472">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#5472">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#5472">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Folks,&#160;

WRT <A HREF="https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1659">https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1659</A>
[Bug 1659] Calibre is too old (0.7.32 vs. 0.8.4, i.e. 31 versions behind!)


Two people asserted that a newer calibre package should go into backports, not updates.

I strongly believe quite the contrary.


I'd like to bring to your attention that calibre, the e-book reader and converter, has an extremely dynamic lifecycle: it released 32 versions in 6 months! Thirty-two versions! (I don't know of any other software that does that, virus signatures not counted.)


Sure thing, some releases might bring some regressions, but each and every version fixes bugs, adds new features, adds support for newer e-reader models, etc. etc. Also, the developer of calibre quickly releases a newer build in the case of serious regressions -- most of the times within 0 to a few days.

Calibre is not like Firefox, to have security fixes that would _require_ a new release to be updated rather than ignored, however, as it's a one-person project (yet a very, very, very popular one! and quite unique in features), it has a number of bugs. Newer versions are most of the time bug-fix releases too, so it's usually a bad idea to skip upgrading it.

Therefore, I strongly believe that all calibre updates be packaged into updates, not backports, especially as there isn't any Mageia 2.0 as of yet. Once Mageia 2.0 is released, whatever newer calibre releases will be available might go into backports instead -- if at all. (Although I'd say that it should still be updated to updates for the whole supported time of 1.0.)

What do you think?

Thank you,
R-C (aka Beranger with an acute accent)

</PRE>









































































































































































































<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="005476.html">[Mageia-dev] Some news regarding rpm packaging rules : %clean	section
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="005485.html">[Mageia-dev] Question about backports: calibre (bug 1659)
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#5472">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#5472">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#5472">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#5472">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>