1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
|
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Repository%20question%3A%20where%20do%20we%20put%0A%20non-free%2Btainted%20RPMs%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4E145481.4050503%40gmx.de%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="006398.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="006402.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?</H1>
<B>Thorsten van Lil</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Repository%20question%3A%20where%20do%20we%20put%0A%20non-free%2Btainted%20RPMs%3F&In-Reply-To=%3C4E145481.4050503%40gmx.de%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?">tvl83 at gmx.de
</A><BR>
<I>Wed Jul 6 14:26:41 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006398.html">[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="006402.html">[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6399">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6399">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6399">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6399">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>Am 06.07.2011 14:04, schrieb Ahmad Samir:
><i> On 6 July 2011 13:58, Romain d'Alverny<<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">rdalverny at gmail.com</A>> wrote:
</I>>><i> On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 12:10, Wolfgang Bornath<<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">molch.b at googlemail.com</A>> wrote:
</I>>>><i> If we go back to the beginning of the discussion where to put such
</I>>>><i> packages which were in PLF we made a clear difference:
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> 1. All non-free goes into non-free
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> 2. Software which may be illegal in some countries (mostly because of
</I>>>><i> licensing) will go into tainted.
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> That's all. Clear and simple.
</I>>>><i>
</I>>>><i> The question about GPL or other free licenses is not touched by
</I>>>><i> tainted. So, everything which does not have to go to tainted will go
</I>>>><i> to free (core) or non-free, depending on it's status.
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Indeed. <A HREF="http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=licensing_policy#acceptable_licenses">http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=licensing_policy#acceptable_licenses</A>
</I>>><i> says:
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> "The tainted section accepts software under a license that is might be
</I>>><i> free or open source and which cannot be redistributed publicly in
</I>>><i> certain areas in the world, or due to patents issues."
</I>>><i>
</I>>><i> Reformulating it in an other, more explicit way maybe:
</I>>><i> - "core" hosts 100% free software that can be redistributed anywhere
</I>>><i> (or almost, the world is a bit more complicated than that)
</I>>><i> - "nonfree" hosts non-free software that can be redistributed anywhere (same)
</I>>><i> - "tainted" hosts all the rest, be it free software or not.
</I>>><i>
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Third point is wrong, "a license that is might be free or open
</I>><i> source", which, I think, means only software with an open source
</I>><i> software License.
</I>><i>
</I>><i> Although the wording should be clearer / more precise.
</I>><i>
</I>
The reason why we have tainted is, that there are patents, which
restrain some user to use this software. So, it's a question of
legality, which should get the higher priority. The differentiation if
it's free or not-free is only a question of ideology.
Therefore, for me the situation is very simple. If there are
questionable patents for a software, we have to put it in tainted
(otherwise we destroy the whole idea of core/non-free/tainted). There is
no other option. We may can think about a tainted-free and
tainted-nonfree (like PLF) but IMHO it's not needed and as long as we
don't have such a repo, all tainted packages have to be put into tainted
(no matter what license they use).
Regards,
Thorsten
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="006398.html">[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="006402.html">[Mageia-dev] Repository question: where do we put non-free+tainted RPMs?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#6399">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#6399">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#6399">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#6399">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>
|