summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/zarb-ml/mageia-dev/20101223/001875.html
blob: 4df0a080013ca57f548a684ca4ae5cadcf9d3287 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
 <HEAD>
   <TITLE> [Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
   </TITLE>
   <LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
   <LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20for%20bugzilla&In-Reply-To=%3C20101223194414.GD2660%40sisay.ephaone.org%3E">
   <META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
   <META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
   <LINK REL="Previous"  HREF="001879.html">
   <LINK REL="Next"  HREF="001878.html">
 </HEAD>
 <BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
   <H1>[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla</H1>
    <B>Michael scherer</B> 
    <A HREF="mailto:mageia-dev%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-dev%5D%20Proposal%20for%20bugzilla&In-Reply-To=%3C20101223194414.GD2660%40sisay.ephaone.org%3E"
       TITLE="[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla">misc at zarb.org
       </A><BR>
    <I>Thu Dec 23 20:44:14 CET 2010</I>
    <P><UL>
        <LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001879.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
</A></li>
        <LI>Next message: <A HREF="001878.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#1875">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#1875">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#1875">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#1875">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>
    <HR>  
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:34:35PM +0100, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
&gt;<i> Le mercredi 22 d&#233;cembre 2010 21:25:39, Michael scherer a &#233;crit :
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 01:55:02PM +0100, Frederic Janssens wrote:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; On 2010-12-22, Michael Scherer &lt;<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">misc at zarb.org</A>&gt; wrote:
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; &gt; Le mercredi 22 d&#233;cembre 2010 &#224; 00:32 +0100, Frederic Janssens a &#233;crit :
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; On <A HREF="https://qa.mandriva.com/">https://qa.mandriva.com/</A> anything goes.
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; To permit consistent searches I think we should standardise.
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; The aim would to be to as specific as needed but not more;
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; as far as I know that would be :
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; name-version-release
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; unless the bug is architecture specific, where we would have :
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; &gt; name-version-release.architecture
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; There is already a &quot;architecture&quot; field, afaik, as well as a version field,
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; no ?
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; ( I didn't check as I refuse to enter my password over a insecured http session ).
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; And I think that giving rpm ( and not srpm ) will make search a little bit complex
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; in some corner cases ( can will also cause problem for the next point ). 
</I>&gt;<i> &gt; 
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> So you think the (S)RPM field should only contain SRPM filenames ?
</I>
No, just the srpm name. 
At least from a data point of view.
 
&gt;<i> If yes, I agree with that, because as Frederic stated above, in current 
</I>&gt;<i> Mandriva bugzilla, there's no enforced rule for that. You can put 
</I>&gt;<i> anything in the field, and you often end up with rpm filenames, or 
</I>&gt;<i> simple package names (e.g. &quot;virtualbox&quot;).
</I>&gt;<i> 
</I>&gt;<i> However asking bug reporters to know the SRPM is too much, so this rule 
</I>&gt;<i> can only be enforced on Packagers and Triage Team side I think. This is 
</I>&gt;<i> already how it works on qa.mandriva.com : if you know the SRPM, you put 
</I>&gt;<i> it, if not someone will triage and do it for you.
</I>
Well, that's more a UI question, and so it should be decoralated from the 
way we store data in the DB.  ( now, it may be hard to achieve, but I am sure 
that templates + ajax could do miracle, like &quot;enter the name of rpm here&quot; and
have it searched with js to fill the proper input ). 

-- 
Michael Scherer
</PRE>






<!--endarticle-->
    <HR>
    <P><UL>
        <!--threads-->
	<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="001879.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
</A></li>
	<LI>Next message: <A HREF="001878.html">[Mageia-dev] Proposal for bugzilla
</A></li>
         <LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B> 
              <a href="date.html#1875">[ date ]</a>
              <a href="thread.html#1875">[ thread ]</a>
              <a href="subject.html#1875">[ subject ]</a>
              <a href="author.html#1875">[ author ]</a>
         </LI>
       </UL>

<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev">More information about the Mageia-dev
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>