blob: 9b2966619b051f95b1196c2432efd21698a0c343 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
|
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Le 01/11/2012 08:34, Marja van Waes a écrit :
<blockquote cite="mid:50922614.30600@xs4all.nl" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi everyone,
Before I start going over old NEEDINFO bugs again:
According to the triage guide, incomplete bugs should, if the
requested info isn't supplied, be closed as INVALID.
I don't see anything about originally <b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>valid<span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> bugs, where later
additional information was requested (e.g. because it was filed
against cauldron and cauldron changed a lot, or because the involved
package was updated).
I did close those as OLD if the reporter didn't reply. Was that good
to do in the first place?
If it was good: I'm now wondering how I can keep myself from
accidentally closing reports that have <b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>never<span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> been valid, as OLD
instead of as INVALID, if I don't take a lot more time to read the
reports :/
Cheers,
Marja</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
Well the triage guide was originally copy-paste from mdv, so we can
do whatever we want too.<br>
And beside for ours stats, or angry users, I guess make it simple
without detailing doesn't shock anyone.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>
|
