the new group.
I agree.
The way I see it we should have one group (never mind
the name) with three virtual task forces.
The task forces will not be real, just a sort of
legacy issue for people from the old teams to have
some initial direction in the new team. Ideally,
everybody will contribute where he or she can.
These three virtual task forces should, however, have
a real coordinator. One person who is in charge of
looking out for a specific field. Aside from that
there should be a team leader, who should be one of
the task force leaders.
This way we have a sort of hierarchical structure:
Someone willing to work on web design or a marketing
poster or whatnot turns to the appropriate task
coordinator. He or she then discusses with the other
two what needs to be done for this by which task
force, then one of these three (it doesn't really
matter who) propagates that information back down to
everybody else.
It will work the same way in reverse. The three
coordinators come up with the final list of things
that need to be done for Mga3 (with considerable input
and discussion from everybody, of course) and then
coordinate the tasks.
I think that this allows for maximum communication and
we don't end up with the left hand not knowing what
the right hand is doing.
Furthermore, this allows for individual people to come
up with their own ideas, plans, projects and whatnot
and then act upon them as part of the group. Even if
in the end they are working alone, the whole group is
aware of what is going on.