I think that the first release of Magia have that be like Madriva. Modifications can be implemented in future releases.<div><br></div><div>Adjamilton Júnior<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/9/26 Kristoffer Grundström <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:kristoffer.grundstrom1983@gmail.com">kristoffer.grundstrom1983@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">

  
    
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    Why not create a new format with the best of both worlds (if
    possible)?<br>
    <br>
    .mageia ?<br>
    <br>
    Hoyt Duff skrev 2010-09-26 19:44:
    <div><div></div><div class="h5"><blockquote type="cite">
      <pre>On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 7:13 AM, RAVI KUMAR BALASUBRAMANIAM
<a href="mailto:ravikumar17jan@gmail.com" target="_blank">&lt;ravikumar17jan@gmail.com&gt;</a> wrote:
</pre>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <pre>only thing i hate about mandriva is its rpm based packages
i prefer apt and deb personally

</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <pre> I can understand a personal preference, but why do you believe that
deb is superior to rpm? Given that Mandriva is already rpm-based, what
benefit could be derived from abandoning the existing build system and
urpmi?

&gt;From everything I have read, neither system has a clear advantage over
the other, and the end result of using either is essentially the same.
I don&#39;t believe that changing to a deb-based system would provide any
significant benefit to justify the expense in terms of re-training
devs and  creating a new build system.

</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </div></div></div>

</blockquote></div><br></div>