<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE> [Mageia-discuss] Easyurpmi forMageia ?
</TITLE>
<LINK REL="Index" HREF="index.html" >
<LINK REL="made" HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Easyurpmi%20forMageia%20%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CBANLkTimbv0z8bvqUQLGpKE2RaFZ2vGfjZw%40mail.gmail.com%3E">
<META NAME="robots" CONTENT="index,nofollow">
<META http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<LINK REL="Previous" HREF="004328.html">
<LINK REL="Next" HREF="004319.html">
</HEAD>
<BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff">
<H1>[Mageia-discuss] Easyurpmi forMageia ?</H1>
<B>Wolfgang Bornath</B>
<A HREF="mailto:mageia-discuss%40mageia.org?Subject=Re%3A%20%5BMageia-discuss%5D%20Easyurpmi%20forMageia%20%3F&In-Reply-To=%3CBANLkTimbv0z8bvqUQLGpKE2RaFZ2vGfjZw%40mail.gmail.com%3E"
TITLE="[Mageia-discuss] Easyurpmi forMageia ?">molch.b at googlemail.com
</A><BR>
<I>Sun May 22 17:47:56 CEST 2011</I>
<P><UL>
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004328.html">[Mageia-discuss] Easyurpmi forMageia ?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="004319.html">[Mageia-discuss] Easyurpmi forMageia ?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#4329">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#4329">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#4329">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#4329">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<HR>
<!--beginarticle-->
<PRE>2011/5/22 Romain d'Alverny <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">rdalverny at gmail.com</A>>:
><i> On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 16:51, Juergen Harms <<A HREF="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">Juergen.Harms at unige.ch</A>> wrote:
</I>>><i> There appears to be a large number of users who are not satisfied with the
</I>>><i> Mandriva way of mirror selection (count me in). But this should not
</I>>><i> automatically be interpreted to "Mageia needs easyurpm". Why not submit the
</I>>><i> "standard" mirror selection offered by Mageia to an evolution that takes the
</I>>><i> opinions expressed into account?
</I>><i>
</I>><i> This is more for after Mageia 1 release. Hopefully, we will have
</I>><i> plenty of topics such as this one, that will be discussed/improved
</I>><i> during the Summer.
</I>><i>
</I>>><i> Question - what is more difficult: come to a common opinion on a solution
</I>>><i> where everybody is happy, or do the corresponding implementation???
</I>><i>
</I>><i> You won't please everybody anyway. So prototype something
</I>><i> working/square enough for evaluation, with constraints/rules you find
</I>><i> (or even better, find an existing solution - there must be some
</I>><i> already existing). That suppose that the need is properly defined,
</I>><i> written down first (part of it is "what is not satisfying currently"
</I>><i> and "how can this be done within Mageia infrastructure").
</I>
I think I already defined the (long time existing) requirements properly, not?
See the first 3 "MUST HAVE" points.
I don't think there is an already existing solution in Mandriva/Mageia
(as I said, it was a longterm and still existing bug in mandriva with
no change so far).
--
wobo
</PRE>
<!--endarticle-->
<HR>
<P><UL>
<!--threads-->
<LI>Previous message: <A HREF="004328.html">[Mageia-discuss] Easyurpmi forMageia ?
</A></li>
<LI>Next message: <A HREF="004319.html">[Mageia-discuss] Easyurpmi forMageia ?
</A></li>
<LI> <B>Messages sorted by:</B>
<a href="date.html#4329">[ date ]</a>
<a href="thread.html#4329">[ thread ]</a>
<a href="subject.html#4329">[ subject ]</a>
<a href="author.html#4329">[ author ]</a>
</LI>
</UL>
<hr>
<a href="https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-discuss">More information about the Mageia-discuss
mailing list</a><br>
</body></html>