On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Ahmad Samir <ahmadsamir3891@gmail.com> wrote:
On 6 December 2010 09:29, Ernest N. Wilcox Jr. <ewilcox@bex.net> wrote:
> With regard to the naming of the repository dediocated to software tainted
> with a patent, etc., How about "non-GPL"? I think that such a name should be
> well understood by users of nearly any language, particularly if they are
> familiar with the GPL.
>
> My2cents
> --
> Ernest N. Wilcox Jr.
> Registered Linux User 247790
> ICQ 41060744
>

Read the afro-mentioned thread again; most of those stuff are released
under a GPL/GPL-like license (faad and faac packages for example, for
playing back and encoding using the AAC audio codec, respectively),
they're free open source software, but they infringe some patents.

--
Ahmad Samir

Why don't we call it universe or something like that? It's a neutral meaning where also packages without patents and such with patents can be stored in.

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen

Greetings

Daniel Kreuter